TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Information Avoidance: How People Select Their Own Reality

146 pointsby richardboegliabout 8 years ago

19 comments

pzoneabout 8 years ago
I see no choice but to live like this. The objective truth about how I stack up relative to others, what I amount to in the world, the things I have missed out on and all of the times I've failed others... it is too oppressive to think about. Better keep my blinders on and run forward in my own lane.
评论 #13882877 未加载
评论 #13883403 未加载
meejabout 8 years ago
Calvin Mooers pointed this out in 1959, and his observation is known to information scientists as Mooers&#x27; Law. He was speaking mostly in the context of information retrieval, but he also described how it&#x27;s true in a more general sense:<p>&quot;Having information is painful and troublesome. We all have experienced this. If you have information, you must first read it, which is not always easy. You must then try to understand it. To do this, you may have to think about it. The information may require you to make decisions about it or other information. The decisions may require action in the way of a troublesome program of work, or trips or painful interviews. Understanding the information may show that your work was wrong, or that your boss was wrong, or may show that your work was needless. Having information, you must be careful not to lose it. If nothing else, information piles up on your desk—unread. It is a nuisance to have it come to you. It is uncomfortable to have to do anything about it. Finally, if you do try to use the information properly, you may be accused of puttering instead of working. Then in the end, the incorporation of the information into the work you do may often not be noticed or appreciated. Work saved is seldom recognized. Work done—even in duplication—is well paid and rewarded.&quot;<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;onlinelibrary.wiley.com&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.1002&#x2F;bult.37&#x2F;full" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;onlinelibrary.wiley.com&#x2F;doi&#x2F;10.1002&#x2F;bult.37&#x2F;full</a><p>i am a bit surprised and disappointed that this new paper makes no mention of Mooers at all.
garysielingabout 8 years ago
One of the great things about the internet is that you can choose to listen to people you might never meet or get along with, and update your views accordingly without the psychological pain described in the article.<p>A lot of libraries have archives of oral histories, which are a really great window into other people&#x27;s lives, especially as a correction for assuming you know what someone else is thinking.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.findlectures.com&#x2F;?p=1&amp;type1=Historical%20Speech&amp;talk_type_l2_Historical_Speech=-Oral%20histories,Filmed%20Interviews,Oral%20Histories,Filmed%20interviews,Ethnography,Personal%20narratives" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.findlectures.com&#x2F;?p=1&amp;type1=Historical%20Speech&amp;...</a><p>It seems like there ought to be a good way to categorize these topically, although I&#x27;m not sure what that should be.
评论 #13885363 未加载
wu-ikkyuabout 8 years ago
&gt;&quot;Bombarding people with information that challenges their cherished beliefs — the usual strategy that people employ in attempts at persuasion - is more likely to engender defensive avoidance than receptive processing.<p>^The great fallacy of the stereotypical Facebook&#x2F;television political flame war&#x2F;shout fest. The result is almost always detrimental to both sides&#x27; understanding of eachother.
评论 #13885003 未加载
nathan_f77about 8 years ago
I feel this pressure whenever I come up with a new startup idea. I hate doing lots of research, only to find that my idea has already been done. Most recently, I wasn&#x27;t very happy with a portable router that I had bought, so I started brainstorming ideas for a new travel router that would be extremely easy to use and to set up. My idea was that your new wifi password would seamlessly sync to the router, and you could set it up from streamlined OSX toolbar or mobile application. But then I found the ASUS WL-330NUL, which already does everything I was imagining. And I also realized that I could never compete with hardware like that. I was just going to build a prototype with a Raspberry Pi and a few wifi adapters.<p>On a related topic: I hold very liberal views, and I&#x27;ve recently tried to expose myself to more conservative opinions. So far I&#x27;ve just subscribed to &#x2F;r&#x2F;Conservative on Reddit, and I&#x27;ve read a few articles on Breitbart and other conservative sites. I also read through some of the comments, which was very frightening. That is not a place for intellectual discussion. I have relatives who often send me articles from <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;creation.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;creation.com</a>, so there&#x27;s another source of information that I try to avoid..<p>Also, a few days ago I was on a flight, and the person next to me was telling me about his flat earth beliefs, and a wide variety of other conspiracy theories. He mentioned how Breivik was just a scapegoat, because the government had ordered the killing of those children. And also 9&#x2F;11 was an inside job, Stalin was a hero, and how The Hunchback of Notre Dame takes place in Saigon, Vietnam. (I believe he came to that conclusion after visiting the Notre-Dame cathedral in Saigon.) It was an interesting 3 hours. At one point he was telling me how the sun is only 50 kilometers wide, and it moves around on giant cables. Also, there are no satellites in space. They are all underground, and that&#x27;s how GPS works. Also that&#x27;s why GPS sometimes has problems, because Google&#x27;s Maps are all wrong. I tried to really understand all of his views, but I can&#x27;t say they were very compelling. It&#x27;s strange, because he was a very well-read person, and seemed quite smart, apart from these insane views.
评论 #13884352 未加载
评论 #13885989 未加载
评论 #13885109 未加载
评论 #13886003 未加载
评论 #13884931 未加载
评论 #13885405 未加载
评论 #13883725 未加载
cmehdyabout 8 years ago
Trying to be as open as possible and ready to debate is exhausting, and often leaves one tired and misunderstood. I can see how the &#x27;big picture&#x27; reward isn&#x27;t worth the day-to-day depression and anxiety. I still have yet to figure out the most efficient balance between more information and more inner stability.
评论 #13884045 未加载
pellaabout 8 years ago
&quot;Semmelweis reflex<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Semmelweis_reflex" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Semmelweis_reflex</a><p><i>&quot;The Semmelweis reflex or &quot;Semmelweis effect&quot; is a metaphor for the reflex-like tendency to reject new evidence or new knowledge because it contradicts established norms, beliefs or paradigms.&quot;</i><p>===<p>Bonus: &quot;Look at yourself objectively&quot; (by Aaron Swartz )<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aaronsw.com&#x2F;weblog&#x2F;semmelweis" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aaronsw.com&#x2F;weblog&#x2F;semmelweis</a>
tunesmithabout 8 years ago
I think I dislike about papers like this, or at least how people <i>refer</i> to papers like this, is that it&#x27;s easily phrased as a universal truth. As in, applying to 100% of the people 100% of the time. Which is clearly ridiculous, or else no one would ever change their minds from conflicting evidence at all.
评论 #13882853 未加载
评论 #13883545 未加载
processingabout 8 years ago
We&#x27;re drowning in information. What do we need - More Ad targeting?<p>&quot;The researchers believe understanding when, why and how people avoid information can help governments, firms and organizations reach their audiences effectively without drowning them in unwanted messages&quot;.<p>Proposal to rename the Paper?<p>How we can help you with your message targeting.
sushobhanabout 8 years ago
Sometimes people&#x2F;institution even become aggressive when they get information that is completely opposite of what they believe, Galileo was convicted of heresy because he believed that the Earth revolves around the Sun, which was just opposite of what Catholic Church believe. Though this kind of rigidity hinders our progress but there is another side of the coin. This is the sole reason that keeps us happy in everyday life. If we take into consideration each and every information&#x27;s then our life will become a hell for sure. We can&#x27;t take veggies and fruits, mostly toxic due to the preservative used; can&#x27;t use car&#x2F;bus as its harmful to the environment, can&#x27;t even eat a burger or coke, leads to obesity. I think it&#x27;s better to have the gift of avoidance though rigidness should be avoided.
评论 #13883998 未加载
评论 #13883418 未加载
richardboegliabout 8 years ago
Link to the paper: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aeaweb.org&#x2F;atypon.php?doi=10.1257&#x2F;jel.20151245" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aeaweb.org&#x2F;atypon.php?doi=10.1257&#x2F;jel.20151245</a>
norea-armozelabout 8 years ago
I think some information is often a mixture of truths and lies which is why I tend to filter out all the major left&#x2F;right media outlets on my Google News feed. I&#x27;m just not interested in playing fact checker for every newspaper because they have some left&#x2F;right crusader journalist that&#x27;s willing to die on a hill for a particular current political talking point. If those folks are going to mix lies with the truth then I&#x27;m going to take the risk of being an ignorant jerk that says &quot;I don&#x27;t know, I&#x27;ll have to read up on it&quot; than be led down a blind alley of someone&#x27;s ideology masquerading as &quot;the truth.&quot; Essentially, the most correct position in the majority of cases to be conscientiously ignorant and open to discussion when it&#x27;s applicable to your life. Beyond that, be as dumb as the rest of humanity to the ins and outs of any issue if it&#x27;s not interesting or fun to you.<p>Edit: also, I think this doesn&#x27;t apply to matters that are of immediate relevance and consequence. So I do think someone like POTUS or a US Senator should stay informed if possible.
shamakuabout 8 years ago
One would likely go mad not avoiding the ton of BS&#x2F;propaganda put out daily by the mainstream media circus. Not sure the point of the study, if not to aid said circus to target people more efficiently. One would think there are more noble research to be done, other than to invent more crafty clickbait titles, or disguise your content with some psychological wizardry to evoke emotion, etc...
评论 #13882612 未加载
heynowletsgoabout 8 years ago
Ignorance is bliss. Nothing new. The more extreme edge is the protective power of delusion.
yanilkrabout 8 years ago
The same thing happened in digital advertising. People developed &quot;Banner Blindness&quot; and mostly do not notice the presence of ads in your page. It&#x27;s almost like people are very intelligent and you cannot fool them for a long time.
MaxfordAndSonsabout 8 years ago
Heh, the HN alt-right contingent is curiously mostly absent from these comments, especially given how many of them have recently discovered their passion for hard-line epistemological skepticism. It&#x27;s as if they&#x27;re avoiding the information in this article...
cwiggsabout 8 years ago
This article is interesting. Does anyone know of any studies&#x2F;evidence&#x2F;etc that shows how to get around this issue? Are there certain tactics that help people feel more comfortable with information even when it could have an adverse effect on themselves?
mrdnaabout 8 years ago
Algorithmic curation of content will only continue to lessen the difficulty of active information avoidance &amp; exacerbate the problem over time.
thr3290about 8 years ago
Try to bring facts into discussion about gender gaps, suicide rates, circumcision, criminality, immigration, religion....<p>Everyone has their own religion, including authors of this article:<p>&gt; <i>Despite the consequences, information avoidance isn&#x27;t always a mistake or a reflection of a lazy mind.</i><p>&gt; <i>&quot;People do it for a reason,&quot; ... &quot;Those who do not take a genetic test can enjoy their life until their illness can&#x27;t be ignored</i><p>Genetic tests can only prove predisposition for illness, something like 20% higher chance compared to other people. Bad test is not a death sentence.