TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Xfce bug: “default desktop screen causes damage to monitor”

188 pointsby felipebuenoabout 8 years ago

16 comments

kawsperabout 8 years ago
The bugtracker seems to be taking a nap, omgubuntu have a summary of the &quot;bug&quot; here: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.omgubuntu.co.uk&#x2F;2017&#x2F;03&#x2F;xfce-wallpaper-cat-bug" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.omgubuntu.co.uk&#x2F;2017&#x2F;03&#x2F;xfce-wallpaper-cat-bug</a>
评论 #13948709 未加载
评论 #13948406 未加载
mathwabout 8 years ago
Very strange. Neither of my cats have ever paid the slightest bit of attention to the contents of any screen on any device I own. Yet I know people whose cats like to watch television, so there&#x27;s some thing going on where some cats see screen images as significant and others don&#x27;t. I should go looking for info on that!<p>In any case, I don&#x27;t see how this is XFCE&#x27;s problem. Just change the wallpaper.
评论 #13948876 未加载
评论 #13949970 未加载
评论 #13950527 未加载
woliveirajrabout 8 years ago
I remember my early days of computers (not as old as some folks here, I know) when there was an intense debate on whether a software could cause damage to some hardware.<p>I remember programing a small .asm that would move the head of a floppy to a farther point and it stoped working. Probably not all models would fail, but one particular brand did.<p>Then a intense debate followed that I was wrong. Never talked about it again.<p>Fast-forward, now we have news that nuclear programs had malfunctions caused by cyber-attacks. Ok, not exactly the same &quot;software doesn&#x27;t damage hardware&quot; we talked back then, but...<p>I&#x27;m willing to consider that using software to make some catware cause damages to the hardware should be acceptable too :D
评论 #13948959 未加载
评论 #13949321 未加载
评论 #13948941 未加载
评论 #13949058 未加载
评论 #13948877 未加载
评论 #13949431 未加载
评论 #13949300 未加载
terrywangabout 8 years ago
Long story short: the so-called bug -&gt; monitor damage is not caused by code but cat - obviously NOT `&#x2F;usr&#x2F;bin&#x2F;cat` ;-)
评论 #13948414 未加载
davidddavidsonabout 8 years ago
Try Ratpoison (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nongnu.org&#x2F;ratpoison&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nongnu.org&#x2F;ratpoison&#x2F;</a>) to get rid of the mice.
dexenabout 8 years ago
Archived, as the bugzilla seems to be overloaded right now: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;s5HMf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;s5HMf</a>
PleaseHelpMeabout 8 years ago
I suggest the patch here: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;5s2hM0p" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;5s2hM0p</a>
评论 #13948419 未加载
pleasecalllaterabout 8 years ago
I think those cats need some upgrade. If they are not compatible with XFCE that&#x27;s rather not XFCE&#x27;s fault.
评论 #13948413 未加载
gargravarrabout 8 years ago
Slashdot effect on the Xfce bugtracker...
评论 #13948677 未加载
peter_retiefabout 8 years ago
Gosh I use Xfce when on desktop mode, reminds me it&#x27;s time to get a kitten again
secultabout 8 years ago
Hacker News clearly knows how to DDoS websites.
评论 #13948625 未加载
评论 #13959804 未加载
kwhitefootabout 8 years ago
April 1st early this year?
noir_lordabout 8 years ago
Can&#x27;t reproduce on modern hardware (4 Year Old Black Female Cat, 4 Year Old Black Male Cat).<p>status:Wont Fix
评论 #13948405 未加载
评论 #13948418 未加载
ishitatsuyukiabout 8 years ago
Heh, it&#x27;s not April yet ;)
Qantouriscabout 8 years ago
Soon it will get a new licence: we are not responsible for cat damage.
评论 #13948670 未加载
Maskawanianabout 8 years ago
Just change the background? I don&#x27;t think XFCE should change because cats are attacking monitors.
评论 #13948397 未加载
评论 #13948400 未加载