TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Letter and symbol misrecognition in highly legible typefaces (2015)

33 pointsby isralcdukeabout 8 years ago

3 comments

hackuserabout 8 years ago
If you are a professional in the field of typography, what is the&#x2F;an authoritative source on (mis)recognition of characters - if that is even the correct term and if I am asking the right question? (Maybe typeface only has a tiny effect, for example.)<p>It interests me and I pick it up in bits and pieces as I come across it, but that&#x27;s slow, leaves holes in my understanding, and it&#x27;s unreliable: I&#x27;m never sure of the quality of what I&#x27;m reading - is it just some person&#x27;s opinion? A fringe theory? etc.
评论 #14111192 未加载
评论 #14110135 未加载
评论 #14113239 未加载
notacowardabout 8 years ago
I prefer the &quot;infant&quot; lowercase &#x27;a&#x27; purely on the basis of aesthetics. The two-story &#x27;a&#x27; seems fussy and pedantic. And the loopy &#x27;g&#x27; descender that&#x27;s so fashionable nowadays drives me nuts. In both cases I suppose an argument can be made that the versions I dislike are better for readability, and thus should be preferable as defaults, but I&#x27;m glad we almost always get to choose our own typefaces most of the time nowadays.
评论 #14111014 未加载
mbrookesabout 8 years ago
Ironic then that this article is set in a hard-to-read typeface!