TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Theranos Agrees to Pay $4.65M in Arizona Refunds

57 pointsby radnamabout 8 years ago

7 comments

propmanabout 8 years ago
The biggest takeaway from Theranos is that investigative Journalism is not dead. John Careryu (sp?) single handedly dug up the truth in a non disparaging factual manner and went up against a team of ruthless lawyers threatening to utterly destroy him, the Journal, and his source. That source was a 24 year old hero whose parents put up their house as collateral just to help their son do the right thing when he had no monetary gain from it. After learning so much about the bullshit Theranos did, every nail that pushes it further into the ground has given me a justice euphoria high. I'll be following this until it's end
评论 #14143086 未加载
RangerScienceabout 8 years ago
The story of Theranos makes me think about where the &quot;great filter&quot; lines for startups are.<p>My prior company - who I was with from ~20 people to the current 300+ - has been going through some shakeups that make me wonder. This adds to my thinking.<p>I&#x27;d have thought that both were past those lines - hundreds of people, multiple offices? Seems like it&#x27;d be solid at that point.<p>The common factor is that both have yet to release their &quot;flagship&quot; product, although they&#x27;ve released products.<p>Then you can think about small products with small teams - Sidekiq, Cards Against Humanity - that achieve substantial success.<p>It seems like this is the most telling &quot;filter&quot; - did you release your core product?<p>Thoughts?
评论 #14143641 未加载
评论 #14143110 未加载
评论 #14143098 未加载
评论 #14143171 未加载
评论 #14143166 未加载
blizkreegabout 8 years ago
How long would this have gone on if not for the investigative piece? Would it have eventually cost someone their life? That&#x27;s the scary part.
martin1975about 8 years ago
where&#x27;s fu*kedcompany.com when you need it...
Boothroidabout 8 years ago
I remember thinking Theranos&#x2F;Elizabeth Holmes was too good to be true from the very first time I read about it, no lie. Was it really plausible that this young woman could come up with an idea that the whole medical industry had missed? I can&#x27;t quite articulate why, but it just didn&#x27;t seem like medicine would be ripe for disruption in the same way as other industries that we&#x27;ve seen turned upside down. It takes <i>decades</i> for advances in cancer etc. Had Theranos really managed to stumble on something the entrenched players had missed? Such a strange story, so much money apparently squandered, and yet the zombie still stumbles on. How long before it&#x27;s finally put out of its misery?!
user5994461about 8 years ago
Could we have a summary for people like me who are not familiar with them?<p>What&#x27;s the case on Theranos? what did they do and sale? What happened?
评论 #14143425 未加载
评论 #14143158 未加载
评论 #14143206 未加载
Mzabout 8 years ago
To my disgust, the biggest thing most people seem to take away from it is &quot;Yup, that&#x27;s what happens when a woman is in charge of a business.&quot;<p>I&#x27;m a woman. I am fine with her burning. But, geez, I hate the idea that there is lava-like splash back spattering all other women in the world who are trying to be taken seriously.
评论 #16595475 未加载
评论 #14143520 未加载
评论 #14143186 未加载
评论 #14143169 未加载
评论 #14143140 未加载
评论 #14143482 未加载
评论 #14143443 未加载
评论 #14143143 未加载
评论 #14143089 未加载
评论 #14143297 未加载
评论 #14143396 未加载
评论 #14143159 未加载
评论 #14143659 未加载
评论 #14143670 未加载
评论 #14143315 未加载