TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Twitter launches own shortener t.co

151 pointsby JereCohalmost 15 years ago

18 comments

apikealmost 15 years ago
From users' perspective, the big thing here is that clients can now show where links in tweets actually lead. For brevity, the link text should probably just be the domain it leads to, but it should make things a whole lot more readable.<p>Before - This is a great news site: <i><a href="http://bit.ly/2Mp91y" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2Mp91y</a> </i><p>After - This is a great news site: <i>news.ycombinator.com</i><p>A loss for URL shortener services, but a win for users.
评论 #1415666 未加载
评论 #1416227 未加载
mattmanseralmost 15 years ago
What is wrong with these people, just fix twitter so url's don't count to the count.<p>Morons.<p>There's no better user experience to a shortened url, it's like having unprotected sex with a random in a nightclub, you've no idea what you could end up with.<p>Repeat after me, shortened urls break the web and are inherently evil.
评论 #1415657 未加载
评论 #1415656 未加载
评论 #1416355 未加载
评论 #1415671 未加载
briansmithalmost 15 years ago
Besides URL shorteners being totally unnecessary, this just slows down users' browsing and diminishes their privacy. Basically, every Twitter app will have to become Spyware in order to comply with Twitter's new ToS.<p>FWIW, Here are my messages to the Twitter developer list about it:<p><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/msg/103fa01c26ecbd55" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/msg/...</a><p><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/msg/c230ab4054b6536a" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/msg/...</a><p>I think it is disgusting how Twitter has appropriated the old post-9/11 "we're spying on you for for own safety" stance that governments have been terrorizing citizens with. Basically, their spyware is protecting you from...other spyware. All for a fraction of a fraction of a penny per click.<p>Also note that their t.co shortener will create links that are 19 characters long. But, j.mp links are only 18 characters long, which means t.co links won't even be as short as possible. So, it's worse all around.
paulgbalmost 15 years ago
&#62; If you are already partial to a particular shortener when you tweet, you can continue to use it for link shortening and analytics as you normally would, and we'll wrap the shortened links you submit.<p>I really hope this habit doesn't catch on. If it does each link will have three points of failure instead of one (as it should) or two (as it will with t.co).
评论 #1415675 未加载
评论 #1416744 未加载
bonaldialmost 15 years ago
"routing links through this service will eventually contribute to the metrics behind our Promoted Tweets platform and provide an important quality signal for our Resonance algorithm"<p>So this is Twitter's Digg bar: they want to wrap and trace <i>every</i> link that goes in a Tweet? So much for all those custom bit.ly domains. So much for bit.ly.<p>These guys are going crass quick. @alex's decision to quit is less and less surprising.
评论 #1415897 未加载
评论 #1415959 未加载
评论 #1415901 未加载
adityaalmost 15 years ago
Note: As Raffi clarified, this isn't a "shortener" but a "wrapper"<p><a href="http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/15739646901" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/15739646901</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/15739827266" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/twitterapi/status/15739827266</a>
评论 #1416642 未加载
arohneralmost 15 years ago
"We will be updating the TOS to require you to check t.co and register the click."<p>Damn. Looks like URL shorteners are here to stay, permanently, and twitter is crowding out all existing link shorteners.
评论 #1415655 未加载
评论 #1415606 未加载
评论 #1415712 未加载
SkyMarshalalmost 15 years ago
Interesting shoutout at the end to COInternet and the now-global .co TLD. I wasn't even aware of that.<p>They're running quite a marketing campaign for the launch, anyone think it will rival .com's popularity?
评论 #1415715 未加载
评论 #1415747 未加载
评论 #1415700 未加载
评论 #1416445 未加载
评论 #1417050 未加载
scorchinalmost 15 years ago
From their help page: <a href="http://help.twitter.com/entries/109623" rel="nofollow">http://help.twitter.com/entries/109623</a><p>&#62; "All links included in Direct Message notification emails currently pass through our link service and are converted to a <a href="http://t.co" rel="nofollow">http://t.co</a> link. We've also begun testing this service for links in Tweets"<p>I'm curious whether they're going to outright put a blanket ban on "alternative" URL shorteners like they did with Twitter-based Ad services.
评论 #1415591 未加载
dtsingletaryalmost 15 years ago
I think URL shorteners are cool, and all the rage, but: - I remember when del.icio.us/ came out. Not that it's a shortener, but they all have this clever naming crap. When you're not able to click the link, it's awfully hard to remember-- okay, did the first period come after the first three letters? What's the bottom domain, again? How do you even spell delicious? Did they spell it right?<p>- There's an implicit trust that must be made before expecting a user to click on any shortened URL. Since you can't follow it through to the content without actually clicking on it, there's no way of knowing whether you're headed to a clever browser hijack (or worse)!<p>- Which brings us to the work-safe barrier that most everyone who works a real job has. Websense, in most cases, blocks anything that's streaming media, TV, porn, advertisements, gambling, etc. etc. etc. And then it logs it, and it logs which user accesses it. When I'm at work, I'm pretty judicious-- I don't want to be recorded as clicking on YouTube links, or listening to Kanye West's latest gaffe, let alone going to Facebook or Myspace. URL shortners completely obfuscate where the link is taking you-- so the damage is done without you even knowing what choice you make. Therefore, unless I'm absolutely certain it came from someone I know, and it's specified what it is, I'm not clicking that shit. Which brings us back to implicit trust.<p>Most people don't check the links first, or even do this 'trust check' before they click on links. How long until we see, "Woman fired for watching Jack Johnson video on company time?" (accidentally, of course). It shouldn't be that way, but it will be before too long.
JereCohalmost 15 years ago
It will also be expanding the size of the tweet to 140 not including the URI and providing expanded URIs in addition to the shortened link. More information at <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread/thread/14d5474c13ed84aa" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/brow...</a>
评论 #1416231 未加载
philwelchalmost 15 years ago
I wonder when some tiny country will decide to just turn their entire top-level national TLD into a url shortener.
评论 #1415958 未加载
评论 #1415795 未加载
sbierwagenalmost 15 years ago
Any reason Twitter just doesn't let you use HTML anchors, and skip this whole mess?
评论 #1415718 未加载
dolphensteinalmost 15 years ago
Why not just do a direct link and just shorten the anchor text? Bypass all this t.co crap.
samaparicioalmost 15 years ago
Instead of all this complexity, why not simply NOT COUNT the characters of any URL? There is no reason anymore for 140 characters.
thegyppoalmost 15 years ago
Question is, will they start redirecting shortened links via affiliates to generate additional revenue?
rbransonalmost 15 years ago
It lists another company in the WHOIS for the t.co domain. This begs the question: are they leasing it?
评论 #1415734 未加载
fseekalmost 15 years ago
What a way to kill bit.ly and others....