I read the whole article a couple of times, I find it hugely interesting. The part where they wonder if they are taking what could be $57K students and getting $7K students was fascinating, and obvious in retrospect. The answer is no, they are getting $7K students where they would not have gotten a $57K student.<p>The part about the prof interacting more with the online students was also interesting.<p>Color me weird, because the other comments here seem like "meh", but I think this is a big deal. Have an upvote :)
"Tests are proctored by a company that locks down a student’s computer remotely and uses its camera to check for cheating"<p>I'm surprised that is sufficient.