In the United States there are a lot of fiber to the home providers that offer gigabit speeds and cable companies are starting to offer gigabit speeds over their hybrid fiber coaxial networks. With these deployments and the incoming fixed wireless/5G era will 2018 be the year of gigabit in the United States?
Here in Vancouver, Canada, the main telco (Telus) started a fibre to the home build out throughout a number of cities and suburbs.
They are offering 150mbps symmetrical fibre for $47/mo (less for the first 3 months), and greater savings if you bundle with TV (which includes 4K).
The main cable company (Shaw) had to up their offering, and now have a 150mbps down/15mbps up for around the same price. Both carriers require multi year contracts.
In some areas of the city that have lots of new high density development, there are some smaller players that are offering faster fibre to the suite options.
Novus offers gig up and 100mbps down for $96. They also have other lower cost plans, as well as monthly add on fees for symmetrical transfer and unlimited data.
Another player, Urban Fibre, offers symmetrical gigabit for $79/mo (when they first launched it was $49/mo).<p>I wonder about how strong the consumer demand for gigabit internet actually is. If you're reading this, you probably have it or want it if you don't, but if you're the average person looking for a place to live (rent or own), how much will available internet speed be a factor (compared to location, cost, and other considerations like schools, fire stations, nightlife, commuting distances, access to public transit, and so on)?
A family of 4 can all stream different HD content on Netflix with a 25mbps connection. Not many homes would have multiple 4K/UHD displays, so would likely be ok with 50-60mbps.
What else are people needing all this bandwidth right now?
God, I hope so. Google Fiber is feet from my home, but refuses to lay cable. Those who got it seem to like it, but it looks like it's just too expensive for them to continue at this point. And that's in the city they started with!<p>ISPs are holding out though, when Google came into town the current monopoly "magically" came up with 3X speeds. (300mb/s). Seemingly out of nowhere.
Im no expert - but it seems the rollout for such speeds always starts in major cities. Then rolls from there... at least from the big providers. Demand for such speeds (outside of techies etc) is probably not as wide as you might think. Theres a ton of people who barely get dsl speeds that wouldnt even know any better.<p>Lots of factors, but $ is probably the largest
Not soon enough. Where I live the best you can get is 300/300 fiber, only in select parts of town, & for prices that (to me) aren't affordable. For now I put up with 3/1, since it's included with rent. Until I can afford to move & maybe do better then.
I feel like it is going to be small competitors that bring about the gigabit broadband to the masses. I'm moving this week and the new house is eligible for gigabit (I signed up and am excited) but the company is small and only covers one town (suburb of Chicago).
I honestly don't think there is consumer demand TBH. The biggest driver of consumer demand for broadband speed is streaming video. Even 4k streams are only about 20-30Mbit/sec. So 200Mb would do numerous of these simultaneously, I don't see where the demand for 1G will come from.<p>Also I'm not sure if GPON deployments can really be considered as "gigabit" given the shared medium, 5G fixed wireless even less so. Gigabit DOCSIS does look possible (but using more spectrum per user,) I don't think there will be a massive push for it either.