TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Search vs. Social: viral is the new SEO

11 pointsby jaf12dukealmost 15 years ago

3 comments

MicahWedemeyeralmost 15 years ago
SEO is not dead, social media is not a replacement. Ignore SEO to your own detriment.<p>Real life example: My startup, DoLeaf (<a href="http://doleaf.com" rel="nofollow">http://doleaf.com</a>). We get the majority of our sales via SEO/Google. All we had to do to get there was to make sure to follow basic SEO guidelines (title tag, h1's, etc.)<p>People find us by searching on Google for very specific plants. They see a result that says "Buy XXX on DoLeaf". Click result, click checkout, done. Google sends high quality, high conversion traffic. Once we set it up, it required no further work on our part. Day and night, Google is sending us sales.<p>Contrast that to social media. Do we entice people to tweet about our plants? Add them to their Facebook profile? What? And how to do it? Successfully spinning up a viral loop is difficult to do and difficult to track. Finally, social media mentions grow stale pretty quick, so you've got to constantly feed that machine somehow to stay relevant.<p>We're not planning on ignoring social media, but you definitely should not ignore SEO. It hasn't been replaced by social media, just augmented. A different tool, a different purpose.
评论 #1440055 未加载
Julianhearnalmost 15 years ago
Facebook driving more traffic than google, no chance.<p>This article is pure linkbait.<p>If you think you survive without google traffic just block google bot in your robots.txt
iamdavealmost 15 years ago
Making a campaign and calling it "viral" doesn't make it so.