The formatting is ridiculous. Also, much of the article is written from an outdated point of view. In particular, dendritic arbors - the complicated and highly structured tree-like structures of a neuron that receive inputs - are now known perform complicated, nonlinear processing.<p>He attributes much of the insights of computational neuroscience to "AI" researchers. This is incorrect. The early theoretical insights in neuroscience largely came from neuroscientists with some mathematical training - or physicists who abandoned physics and moved to biology.
Erm, the submitted link is horribly formatted and lacks a proper citation or even a date. This article is from 1988. For those with JSTOR access:<p><a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/20025141" rel="nofollow">http://www.jstor.org/stable/20025141</a>