The whole thread is worth reading.<p><a href="http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-July/thread.html#79673" rel="nofollow">http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-July/thre...</a><p><a href="http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-July/thread.html#79673" rel="nofollow">http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-July/thre...</a>
> (Well, in case of these two, better to check that person has some grasp of static typing :))<p><a href="http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/typespec.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/typespec.html</a><p><a href="http://web.mit.edu/drscheme_v42/.share.sun4x_510/plt/doc/ts-reference/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.mit.edu/drscheme_v42/.share.sun4x_510/plt/doc/ts-...</a><p>Shouldn't be that hard. It's not because the language is dynamic that it doesn't support static types ;)
How easy is it to hire <i>good</i> programmers?<p>It is easier to hire good Haskell programmers because people who choose Haskell are interested in what they are doing.