Definition of dead should be "can't connect to a node" not based on market cap. For example, BlakeBitcoin is alive as far as I can tell, bc merge mined with Blakecoin. You can totally fire up a client and transact in BBTC. Now it may not be worth much or have liquidity on an exchange, but that is not "dead" just "cheap".
Why would we ever want a blacklist when a whitelist is so much saner? The ether is littered with the walking corpses of coins intended only to deceive/P&D.<p>Relatively short list of "verified" (by a "team of analysts") crypto assets [1] (YMMV).<p>[1] <a href="https://cryptonaire.com/crypto-assets/" rel="nofollow">https://cryptonaire.com/crypto-assets/</a>
I rather prefer a list of ICOs with a high potential and long-term perspective.<p>That many ICOs are Ponzi or close to scam is nothing new.Such a list feels more like a personal justification for 'I don't need to invest, I won't miss anything and BTC and ETH were the last success stories in crypto'.
“Add data” ... “Add data”, all rather lame.<p>Minkiz has the data ... <a href="https://minkiz.co/coin/name/" rel="nofollow">https://minkiz.co/coin/name/</a> (basically just a rendering of the metadata in DOACC (<a href="https://github.com/DOACC/individuals" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/DOACC/individuals</a>).<p>Admittedly I stopped recording in March last year but nevertheless.
I wonder where on the Hype Cycle[1] cryptocurrencies (and blockchain technology in general) currently are.<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle</a>
Was this list automatically generated in some way? I'm trying to prune a large list of inactive coins right now, and manually checking their activity has been tedious.