TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: How would you fix cities?

29 pointsby timfrietasover 7 years ago
If you could significantly change them to run more efficiently, what would you do to change them?

16 comments

maxharrisover 7 years ago
On a heavily-used block with tall buildings on both sides, here&#x27;s a recipe that will work well:<p>1. Dig up the street and sidewalks, going down 60-100 feet.<p>2. At the bottom of this pit, drive in piles if you haven&#x27;t yet hit bedrock.<p>3. Build a box, about twenty feet high, to run plumbing, power internet, and other utilities<p>4. On top of that box, build another one for a train.<p>5. On top of that box, build another one for vehicles to pass through. Because we&#x27;re aiming for the future, we can assume that the vehicles in this box will be purely electric, and won&#x27;t need the kind of ventilation that most of today&#x27;s vehicles do.<p>6. On top of that box, build a basement, perhaps with alleyway access on both sides (these should be narrow - no wider than approximately 15 feet.)<p>7. Now we&#x27;re on the street level, above ground - a building should rise up minimally two to four stories from here. On both sides, narrow streets should be constructed, reserved only for foot traffic. Shops, bars and restaurants of varying sizes should line both sides of the street.<p>8. Install vibration and light sensors inside each partition wall in the new buildings, as well as in the existing buildings that line the street. Establish a legal framework allows anyone to use the spaces inside each building for any purpose, so long as both parties on either side of each wall and floor agree to specified limits (with the existing owner&#x27;s terms taking precedence over that of the newcomer - note that there is give and take here, as a space in which you can&#x27;t make any noise or let any light leak out isn&#x27;t worth much compared to one in which you can.) With this in place, inflexible one-size-fits-all zoning restrictions are no longer needed.<p>This arrangement can be implemented slowly, on a block-by-block basis, to transform any any every pedestrian-unfriendly American city into a vibrant urban paradise for people like me that seek this.
评论 #15206326 未加载
评论 #15209919 未加载
评论 #15205066 未加载
评论 #15205076 未加载
评论 #15205542 未加载
shortoncashover 7 years ago
I would restrict traffic to very specific use cases, like Uber, taxis, public transit, and charge high tolls for everyone else. Then, I&#x27;d encourage e-bike or bike rebates&#x2F;tax credits. The traffic situation in cities is really out of hand. The fact that this country has an obesity epidemic just makes this solution even more appealing to me.<p>This isn&#x27;t really a &quot;freedom&quot; oriented line of thinking and I get a lot of hate from people with certain political bents when I mention this idea, but there&#x27;s no social value in total gridlock. Cities are a special situation where the streets are a public resource that needs to be allocated properly. The streets are nowhere near being allocated properly in most of the cities I have lived in.
评论 #15212139 未加载
AnimalMuppetover 7 years ago
That&#x27;s not easy.<p>Take public transit, for instance. Arguably, that would be a good thing to change - supply fast, frequent, convenient public transit. But how would you do it?<p>US cities (with few exceptions) have reached a stable equilibrium where cars are necessary because there&#x27;s no convenient transit, there&#x27;s no transit because the city doesn&#x27;t have the density to make it worthwhile, and it can&#x27;t have the density because there has to be parking for everybody&#x27;s cars. How do you change that? You have to change all three pieces at once (plus peoples&#x27; attitudes). You almost have to start over with a new city.
评论 #15238062 未加载
评论 #15205024 未加载
davidwover 7 years ago
In the US? Less zoning.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bendyimby.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;06&#x2F;12&#x2F;yimby-reading&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bendyimby.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;06&#x2F;12&#x2F;yimby-reading&#x2F;</a> for more reading.
评论 #15213283 未加载
panicover 7 years ago
What do you mean by &quot;run more efficiently&quot;?<p>Just focusing on space efficiency: very dense cities could build an underground transportation system connecting people&#x27;s homes directly to space-efficient, centralized facilities. Instead of having a kitchen, you would order food or freshly-prepared ingredients to combine yourself. Instead of doing laundry by hand, you would send it to a centralized laundry facility, which would clean it for you and send it back. Trash would be disposed of using the same system. You could also use this system to store and retrieve things you use infrequently, so they don&#x27;t have to take up space in your home.<p>A system like this would enable higher density by reducing the number of facilities you need in and adjacent to your home. It would free up road space by focusing commercial traffic on these centralized facilities instead of distributing it throughout the city. And it would free up road-side space by lowering the demand for laundromats, supermarkets, and so on.
MrTonyDover 7 years ago
I was amazed when I heard that Copenhagen had a government department focused on Quality of Life. And that the bike culture of Denmark was created when they decided that cars were harming their quality of life (it was a 30 year project.) And Finland decided to focus their University on improving life - rather than just generic research. Considering those examples, I would say that cities need to reflect the needs and desires of their citizens - as opposed to the business leaders, the rich, and their politicians.
ajeet_dhaliwalover 7 years ago
Put a limit (e.g. 1) on the number of residential properties any individual person can own within city limits and make them (residential properties only within city limits) illegal to buy for a corporation.<p>A lot of people might think &#x27;socialist&#x27; and I may have said the same a few years ago but having seen issues up front, lives (within some cities) are being completely ruined with the hoarding and speculation.
评论 #15205147 未加载
dangjcover 7 years ago
Do anything recommended by <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.strongtowns.org" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.strongtowns.org</a>
Jemaclusover 7 years ago
Most of my ideas revolve around the need for better transportation.<p>Ideal (for me) but completely impractical: the interstate exits end in giant parking garages. Everyone walks, bikes, or takes light-rail&#x2F;buses to get around the city. Only vehicles allowed in the city are deliver vehicles between 11pm-7am. This would probably only work in very small cities, sadly.<p>More realistic:<p>Las Vegas has the right idea on the Strip, though it definitely needs improvement. Cars and pedestrians should never have to compete for street-crossing opportunities. Pedestrian bridges to cross major avenues. Ground-level entrances should lead to parking garages or elevators.<p>All customer-centric stuff should be on the &quot;second&quot; level where the pedestrians walk. Imagine just taking every sidewalk and jacking it up 12 feet. You aren&#x27;t walking on the street, you&#x27;re walking on a raised sidewalk that goes from building to building. This completely eliminates the need for pedestrians to stop and wait to cross the street, while still allowing cars free reign below. You could turn entire intersections into courtyards, freeing up more real estate for street vendors.<p>This also frees up real estate for larger building footprints -- you don&#x27;t need as many street-level parking spaces if every building&#x27;s ground-floor is a giant parking lot!<p>I&#x27;m sure all of the above is totally impractical and that you&#x27;ll all shoot it down with pesky facts... but a man can dream... :)
WalterBrightover 7 years ago
I&#x27;d make them much more walkable, by blocking off certain short sections of streets from car traffic during certain hours. Many european cities do this, and it works well.
评论 #15205284 未加载
评论 #15205398 未加载
评论 #15205286 未加载
jotjotzzzover 7 years ago
I think Jacque Fresco&#x27;s idea with the Venus Project is worth pondering: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thevenusproject.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thevenusproject.com&#x2F;</a>. I wish the philosophy makes it in new cities being built now. Whatever it may be, we need to live alongside nature and make sure the city produces waste that can be broken down by nature readily, and at the same time it must be a symbiotic relationship.
评论 #15238678 未加载
tmalyover 7 years ago
I would make them more walking and bike friendly.<p>Schools, I would like full control be at the parent level or city level and not at the state of federal level.<p>I would like to see more of the mundane jobs at the city level automated so property taxes could be lowered. In the state I live some property taxes approach 5 percent of the assessed value. High property taxes make it prohibitive for elderly people to retire in the place they grew up in. You lose some of the community.
pythia__over 7 years ago
If obvious inefficiencies are not being fixed, nobody&#x27;s incentives are aligned with fixing them. A sustainable solution must address the wrong or weak incentives, not try to fix the inefficiencies one at a time. Business owners are uniquely empowered and incentivized to address inefficiencies in their businesses and to compete for the customer. They lose money if they provide a product that isn&#x27;t good enough. Making cities businesses would allow you to leverage that.
owebmasterover 7 years ago
I would teach every citizen how society and politics works and that there is no magic solution to social problems.
ilakshover 7 years ago
I came up with some ideas a year or two ago : <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;tinyvillages.org" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;tinyvillages.org</a>
评论 #15205646 未加载
tabethover 7 years ago
Make private passenger vehicles illegal and replace them with buses. Most issues will resolve themselves.