We need to fall to this matter yarely, else we are unraveld. Such acts of terror are not bound by: “ type of weapon”, “nationality”, “circumstances”, etc. Instead of aiming our efforts and resources at the “wrong solutions”, I belive we need to ask first the right questions. We need to boil things down to its most fundamental truths, and reason up from there.
Social engineer here. As a 64yo retired accountant with no military experience, terrorist connection or even police record, Stephen Paddock makes a most unconvincing suspect.
All the false/diversive phonecalls (which is the primary causal factor of the high kill count) and ten ($20,000+) automatic weapons are much more suspicious than any possible motives regarding the 2012 property liability suit against Cosmopolitan Resorts or ongoing divorce. The only other relevant information are a 2003 single engine pilots license and an Alaska hunting license. Again, both unconvincing. I'm left wondering who made all the diversive calls?