TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Readings in Database Systems, 5th Edition (2015)

247 pointsby muramiraover 7 years ago

7 comments

makmanalpover 7 years ago
While this is a seminal work, I definitely wouldn't approach this like I would approach a textbook: it's definitely not meant to be friendly introductory material. That said, once you have a bit of background, it's a goldmine of a survey. You'll notice that each section is a short, few-page long introduction, but the bulk of the material is in the papers themselves, which can be significantly tougher to read. Though it's great that the summaries are friendly and help you contextualize the papers. My tip is to read papers starting with the introduction, and then the conclusion, and then decide if you want to dive into the rest of the paper to track down the evidence for specific claims.
评论 #15438938 未加载
muramiraover 7 years ago
Yesterday, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15428526" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15428526</a> hit number 1 on HN. Having read the two books, I strongly believe that they not only complement each other, but also must be required reading for any data engineer.
评论 #15437454 未加载
fizixerover 7 years ago
Does it have something along the lines of building your own RDBMS from scratch? (If not, any recommendations?)<p>edit: google search has potentially promising results, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=build+your+own+rdbms" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=build+your+own+rdbms</a>
评论 #15439029 未加载
评论 #15437336 未加载
评论 #15437323 未加载
评论 #15437307 未加载
评论 #15437527 未加载
评论 #15437442 未加载
alexnewmanover 7 years ago
Everyone I have met who have worked a long time in the database industry considers stonebreaker to be<p>- Overrated - Overly Self Promoting - Mostly not credible<p>That being said I love his work and his history. The red book is super famous. What gives?
评论 #15438684 未加载
评论 #15441416 未加载
评论 #15438028 未加载
评论 #15440749 未加载
评论 #15438037 未加载
StavrosKover 7 years ago
Is there an epub of this?
评论 #15441686 未加载
评论 #15437351 未加载
0xFFCover 7 years ago
Is this new edition? What have been changed?
评论 #15437024 未加载
评论 #15437020 未加载
zzzcpanover 7 years ago
Redbook is too biased, there is just too much perspective from RDBMS people, which is not relevant in modern distributed environments or even outright incorrect.<p>Redbook inspired list by Christopher Meiklejohn [1] is a better alternative, or Aphyr&#x27;s course outline [2].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;cmeiklejohn&#x2F;cmeiklejohn.github.io&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;_posts&#x2F;2013-07-12-readings-in-distributed-systems.markdown" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;cmeiklejohn&#x2F;cmeiklejohn.github.io&#x2F;blob&#x2F;ma...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;aphyr&#x2F;distsys-class" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;aphyr&#x2F;distsys-class</a>
评论 #15437593 未加载
评论 #15437764 未加载