>"You asked what convinces people to work with us? That's it. It's always the video."<p>And yet the article has no video? Their landing page has the actual video: <a href="https://www.rylo.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.rylo.com/</a><p>or if you just want a direct link: <a href="https://player.vimeo.com/video/240323835" rel="nofollow">https://player.vimeo.com/video/240323835</a>
The article talks about 3 videos that the reviewer was wowed by... but has neither the videos nor links to videos. For a native advertisement piece, this is not the greatest one.
Looks like a GoPro/action camera clone that has image stabilization. I have shot a lot with action cameras, but ended up never editing it or sharing it. I think they're addressing a real issue with making it super easy to edit/share. Also, Apple should be making things easier for device makers to seamlessly transfer data.
I scrolled all the way down for a sample that was not there. Can't believe someone wrote an article about a video camera and did not include a single sample.
„breakthrough stabilization technology“<p>Does this mean mechanical-stabilization of some form (like a free-floating lens mechanism)? Or software-stabilization (usually implies heavily cropping the pic)?
The one thing I look for in any action camera is the ability to hook it up to my PC and use it as a web camera. Cheap $30 spy glasses cams from China have this feature almost universally. Even my old Vivitar pocket digital camera did this.<p>Why do newer more expensive cameras tend to not have this function? Especially in the case of this camera, being able to do a live video from my laptop and simply frame the shot or control it live would be perfect when I'm doing something like live lapidary lessons. Such a simple feature that would guarantee a sale from me, something most cheap ubiquitous cameras have, yet it's not present.