TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Linux sandboxing improvements in Firefox 57

276 pointsby rvernover 7 years ago

9 comments

alex_dufover 7 years ago
I'm so hyped by Firefox 57, haven't felt like that about a webbrowser since Firefox 1.5
评论 #15680853 未加载
评论 #15680981 未加载
评论 #15681342 未加载
评论 #15682922 未加载
评论 #15685759 未加载
评论 #15682828 未加载
评论 #15686465 未加载
评论 #15680622 未加载
vermadenover 7 years ago
People tend to assume that if Firefox 57 or other version will be faster then Chrome, then a lot people would then start to use Firefox instead of Chrome.<p>As much as I would like to see that its not gonna happen, and I am writing this as a Firefox user.<p>Remember what &#x27;REAL&#x27; Opera 12 did in its times comparing to Chrome or Firefox? It loaded pages faster, used less memory, was most standards compliant and also came with bundled torrent client, and mail client and RSS client and ... and having 100+ tabs opened DID NOT EVEN SLOWED IT!<p>... and guess what, both Firefox and Chrome had more users while Opera had about 4-5%.<p>It did not mattered if it was faster or better.<p>Currently Opera is just a Chrome with different skin, so I moved to Firefox with Midori and Iridium as &#x27;backups&#x27;.
评论 #15682873 未加载
评论 #15683191 未加载
评论 #15685600 未加载
dm319over 7 years ago
Can anyone tell me how secure web browsers are on linux generally. I was looking at the pwn2own results and was quite impressed with the edge compromise that got out of the host OS it was running in. However, I didn&#x27;t see any web browsers on linux being compromised - is that because it is harder, or no-one bothered?
评论 #15680665 未加载
评论 #15680604 未加载
评论 #15682458 未加载
评论 #15681270 未加载
评论 #15680360 未加载
beefhashover 7 years ago
I feel like I should point out that Firefox won&#x27;t be getting backported to Debian stable[1]. Until the next Debian stable, it seems that Firefox ESR 52 will be the only version of Firefox.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mozilla.debian.net&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mozilla.debian.net&#x2F;</a>
评论 #15681113 未加载
评论 #15680959 未加载
评论 #15681027 未加载
评论 #15685578 未加载
k__over 7 years ago
OT: Do the Quantum changes get into the Android version or is this a completly different software?
评论 #15683454 未加载
评论 #15682849 未加载
shmerlover 7 years ago
<i>&gt; We could not block the web content rendering entirely from reading the filesystem because Firefox still uses GTK directly - we draw webpage HTML widgets using the same theming as the native desktop.</i><p>Is there a way to build Firefox without GTK? For example for something like Plasma Mobile? It would be good if there was some fallback mode where Firefox would render UI elements using HTML itself, without relying on UI toolkits.
评论 #15680467 未加载
评论 #15680177 未加载
评论 #15680165 未加载
评论 #15680105 未加载
WalterGRover 7 years ago
How does this compare to IE&#x27;s Protect Mode, Enhanced Protection Mode, and Edge&#x27;s execution in an app container?
ComodoHackerover 7 years ago
<p><pre><code> security.sandbox.content.read_path_whitelist </code></pre> Are extensions allowed to change that?
评论 #15680311 未加载
评论 #15680201 未加载
nimbiusover 7 years ago
I&#x27;ve not been inclined to use this browser since they started with pocket, moved to offering a voice and video chat service, forced PulseAudio as a mandatory dependency and eventually enacted mandatory opt-in telemetry in the browser.<p>sandboxing is great, but if the site is spooky enough im just going to load it in elinks&#x2F;lynx and grok the text. Chromium also has sandboxing, and if youre really paranoid enough, surf from suckless.org is a webkit style do-it-yourself browser thats fairly reliable.