TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Elasticsearch 6.0.0 GA released

192 pointsby haakonover 7 years ago

9 comments

eric_bover 7 years ago
The new sequence IDs are the most interesting things in this release I think. Having an officially supported cross datacenter replication strategy would be real nice.<p>Lots of folks will be mad, but removing multiple mapping types is a nice change too. It was a feature that never really made sense. Index-per-type was always the better strategy, even going back to the 0.23 days.<p>As others in this thread will no doubt point out though - the ES folks are moving awfully fast. I still support 1.7.5 clusters that will take heroic efforts to update. I&#x27;d love to use the new features on those clusters, but there simply isn&#x27;t a valid business case to take on the risk. This isn&#x27;t like small NPM packages that you can update on a whim - some of these systems require terabytes of re-indexing to upgrade :&#x2F;
评论 #15699237 未加载
评论 #15699111 未加载
评论 #15699241 未加载
sidiover 7 years ago
My biggest gripe with the 6.0.0 GA is the removal of multiple mapping types per index. This creates a significant breaking change that will hurt the community tools adoption to 6.0. Their initial plan was to deprecate it and only remove it v7 onwards, which imho would&#x27;ve been a better balance.
评论 #15698955 未加载
评论 #15699045 未加载
评论 #15698831 未加载
评论 #15699218 未加载
评论 #15699141 未加载
Qerubover 7 years ago
I&#x27;m excited about the official Docker images now being available (again?) in an OSS flavor without X-Pack. Quote from <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.elastic.co&#x2F;guide&#x2F;en&#x2F;elasticsearch&#x2F;reference&#x2F;6.0&#x2F;docker.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.elastic.co&#x2F;guide&#x2F;en&#x2F;elasticsearch&#x2F;reference&#x2F;6.0&#x2F;...</a> :<p>&gt; The images are available in three different configurations or &quot;flavors&quot;. The basic flavor, which is the default, ships with X-Pack Basic features pre-installed and automatically activated with a free licence. The platinum flavor features all X-Pack functionally under a 30-day trial licence. The oss flavor does not include X-Pack, and contains only open-source Elasticsearch.
评论 #15700137 未加载
jdhawkover 7 years ago
I really wish they&#x27;d included the ElasticSearch SQL in 6.0, but I guess that feature still isn&#x27;t fully baked.<p>Even if it didn&#x27;t have the full power of the Elastic JSON Queries, for simple SELECT COUNT() ..GROUP BY, it would have been a nice addition...oh well, back to counting open and closed brackets...
评论 #15699674 未加载
评论 #15701585 未加载
评论 #15699293 未加载
评论 #15701105 未加载
评论 #15699940 未加载
jordanabover 7 years ago
In a large internal project we still make heavy use of Groovy for scripting. All scripting languages besides the new Painless language were deprecated in version 5, and now in version 6 they are removed. This hampers us in our migration efforts from 5 to 6. Does anyone know if it is still possible to use Groovy through a separate (third party) plugin? I played around a bit with Painless, but can&#x27;t say that I really like it. Documentation was&#x2F;is kind of poor, and it seemed to me it somewhat assumed familiarity with Java and it&#x27;s framework&#x2F;APIs.
评论 #15699085 未加载
评论 #15701545 未加载
sbr464over 7 years ago
Very much appreciate the improvements to handling docs with sparse fields!
lclarkmichalekover 7 years ago
Does Lucene 7.0 have a better story around G1 GC? ES has always warned against it, would love to see if that had changed
评论 #15699486 未加载
评论 #15699630 未加载
sschuellerover 7 years ago
Off topic but how do you guys Unit Test Elastic Search queries? Do you start a full node and dump test data in it?<p>In case of SQL I can start an in memory sqllite and run my tests (Symfony PHP).
评论 #15702563 未加载
chatmanover 7 years ago
Not as exciting as Solr 7 release.
评论 #15699414 未加载