TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The Second Quartile

73 pointsby justinvover 7 years ago

4 comments

Bugeover 7 years ago
At first I wondered why they would write an article bragging that they spend over 75% of their time trying to bring in just 20% of their income. It would obviously be more efficient to focus on increasing the 80% or firing some people and focusing on keeping the 80% the same.<p>Then I realized this is a publicity piece to get startups to allow AVC to invest, assuring startups that AVC will stick by them even if the startup isn&#x27;t great.
评论 #16020955 未加载
sharkweekover 7 years ago
&gt; There will be roughly ten investments per fund that will return maybe 5% of the fund (the third and fourth quartile). We spend a lot of time on these investments and it is difficult work that I have written a lot about over the years. <i>The time and money we spend on these investments is not rational but we do it anyway.</i><p>I notice this in my own work all the time. Some sort of human condition, probably, that &quot;requires&quot; I focus on the biggest headaches to try and solve them, despite probably being a lot of other more beneficial things to focus on when thinking about long term results.<p>As for the whole argument around the second quartile, this just seems to be the ecosystem of venture capital. A business with [insert healthy, reasonable, steady annual growth metric here], fantastic by most standards, doesn&#x27;t initially cut it when VC portfolios require so much bigger returns to remain viable against other asset vehicles. But then suddenly that&#x27;s not the case anymore, once the business has I guess proven itself as being a success relative to other fantastic flare-outs who once had much higher expectations.<p>I always think about that scene from Silicon Valley about &#x27;pre-revenue&#x27; being more exciting for investors: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=BzAdXyPYKQo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=BzAdXyPYKQo</a>
killjoywashereover 7 years ago
Soooo... be in the top half? Seems reasonable but as you select into more competitive demographics, it gets quite challenging. If you&#x27;re up against teams of PhDs at well funded companies, that&#x27;s strong signal that it may get hard to stay in the top half.
评论 #16020659 未加载
threeeyed-ravenover 7 years ago
What&#x27;s the best way to fund yourself if you aren&#x27;t in the first quarter? What&#x27;s non-vc way to fund yourself?
评论 #16019926 未加载