TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Any rich programmers that don't have to work but coding for fun?

39 pointsby ertucetinover 7 years ago
Are there any rich programmers that don't have to work for a company just writing code that what they want to write?

16 comments

TAcoding4funover 7 years ago
(created throwaway for this)<p>Thank fucking GOD I find myself in this position right now! Through some random luck and the sell of an old startup I am now able to take a few years off and just like think and sleep all day and have inappropriately long lunches.<p>At present I am writing crypto currency trading shit just for fun, having a blast, and most importantly, not having to worry about any meetings or struggling for progress on the HUGE PILE OF UNIMPORTANT BULLSHIT THAT WAS MY TODO LIST.<p>A forgot password form? Gimme a fuckin break. A build script??? HAHA.<p>I recommend it highly.
评论 #16173236 未加载
评论 #16161079 未加载
mindcrashover 7 years ago
Notch. Made a shit ton of money selling Mojang&#x2F;Minecraft to Microsoft. Now basically spends his life partying, playing games and coding games for fun. Oh, and shitposting on Twitter. Ofcourse.
评论 #16165094 未加载
Antoninusover 7 years ago
My company pays for my rent and living expenses which allows me to save roughly 50k a year working remotely. I tried working less hours but found myself bored with going to the gym 3 hours a day and working by the pool. I&#x27;d rather be in stinky room surrounded by white boards and joking around with other devs. I found that 5-6 solid hours of productivity is better than 8-9 hours 5 days a week.
zerrover 7 years ago
Non-rich programmer: works on CRUD apps to feed the family.<p>Rich programmer: works on compilers, OS dev, DB internals, in-house 3D engines&#x2F;games, AI, etc... to have fun :)
SirLJover 7 years ago
In a team lead role for a big telco, (build my wealth trough stock trading robots, can retire anytime) and every year cannot get myself to leave and retire early...<p>Too much fun, interesting projects and great team to lead (also working from home helps a lot)...<p>Maybe next year :-)
评论 #16164151 未加载
评论 #16162465 未加载
评论 #16162168 未加载
OneDayMaybeover 7 years ago
Throwaway for this. I&#x27;m virtually there, although not quite: I will inherit ~$1M cash, arguably within the next 1-3 years.<p>I never thought too much about it and did what I thought would interest me anyway; I thought I had to get a sense of what a modern capitalist society really is. I ended up starting a somewhat successful career in CS (I’m in my late 20s), did the 9-5 thing for a few years… but I got to the point where I simply don’t care much anymore. Call it a quiet burn out if you want. Sure, coding can be fun, but I don’t see how “becoming a better programmer” will eventually make me happy. It will at best keep me busy - and most likely won&#x27;t make me contribute with anything too positive for the world at large.<p>I’m not ruling out the fact that I’ll keep writing code in my life for one reason or another; I’m simply not interested in having a career anymore. I feel incredibly lucky to have a safety net that will allow me to decide how to best spend the rest of my life. I also feel the responsibility to do something truly positive with it, and not just for me.
评论 #16164030 未加载
malux85over 7 years ago
Im not rich, but my company affords me this luxury - my basic income is taken care of, and I&#x27;m free to work on what I want to - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ramm.science&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ramm.science&#x2F;</a>
mkjover 7 years ago
Justin Frankel comes to mind. Though REAPER might be profitable, not sure.
matchmike1313over 7 years ago
I don&#x27;t know about rich but I code for my few side-business projects and I decide when to take on more work or when I want to do a project for myself that intrigues me.
评论 #16159991 未加载
ioddlyover 7 years ago
I don&#x27;t know if I&#x27;m rich (actually decidedly not), but I freelance and save a large proportion of my income, and when I&#x27;m not working on client projects I just work on my own, which can be for weeks at a time. My day pretty much looks the same whether I&#x27;m working for a client or myself, but with way less emails&#x2F;Slack&#x2F;whatever taking me out of flow.<p>It&#x27;s a very enjoyable way to pass the time.
4kover 7 years ago
A friend&#x27;s friend. Working in Amazon for 15-16 years (still not manager). His stock would easily make him a millionaire. He puts minimal effort just enough not to get fired, doesn&#x27;t care about promotions, works 6-7 hour days and has a good life. My friend asked him why doesn&#x27;t he quit? He said this job gives him something to do.
评论 #16163672 未加载
everdevover 7 years ago
Yes, and it&#x27;s far more enjoyable now but it&#x27;s harder too.<p>With clients I had deadlines that forced decisions. With only artificial motivators I&#x27;ve found it too easy to follow my passion rather than launching something.<p>But, I do get to explore what I want to now.
评论 #16164804 未加载
stuaxoover 7 years ago
Did this for a year. Saved £30k - enough to go to Asia, but not live like a backpacker, actually live in places and spend roughly working hours on my own projects.<p>Just need to win the lottery now and do it full time.
rozenborover 7 years ago
My friend worked as a teacher of computer science to a guy who is a local bank owner(over 30mil$ fortune) retired at his 70th and studying software development as a hobby. He payed not much btw
yesenadamover 7 years ago
Are you assuming only rich people do that, or only interested in rich programmers? (Whatever &#x27;rich&#x27; means exactly. Whatever definition you have in mind, I mean.)
ainiriandover 7 years ago
I don&#x27;t believe that you have to be rich for that. But I get your point. It is not my case unfortunately, but I believe that some can be doing just that.