Claim is that Clause VI is not clear enough on the succession of Presidency in cases of injury, resignation, or other forms of incapacitation of a sitting President - when in reality Clause VI instructs on the subject and is specific enough to differentiate among these cases.<p>Clause VI is clear in mentioning that in all of these cases, the incapacitation/suspension/resignation of the President's Office also devolves to Office of the Vice President, thus rendering currently adopted amendment unconstitutional.<p>It also prudently allows the Congress to make the selection of an "acting" President from a pool of people loosely referred to as "Officer", until return of sitting President to health or an election.