TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

SENS Research Foundation Receives $2.4M Ethereum Donation from Vitalik Buterin

108 pointsby KasianFranksover 7 years ago

12 comments

joefourierover 7 years ago
If you believe that aging and death is a natural part of life that we should passively accept and are thus opposed to the work done by the SENS Foundation, I encourage you to read the Fable of the Dragon Tyrant by Nick Bostrom: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nickbostrom.com&#x2F;fable&#x2F;dragon.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;nickbostrom.com&#x2F;fable&#x2F;dragon.html</a><p>Life extension remains a currently a critically underfunded part of medical research, primarily due to the social attitudes towards it.
评论 #16301204 未加载
评论 #16301200 未加载
评论 #16301202 未加载
评论 #16301231 未加载
评论 #16301276 未加载
评论 #16301201 未加载
评论 #16301173 未加载
评论 #16301171 未加载
dawhizkidover 7 years ago
It&#x27;s amazing to me, despite so many reproducible studies on genetically similar animals to humans as well as human studies, that people aren&#x27;t more excited by this free and unlimited resource every person on earth already has available to them to fight aging&#x2F;increase longevity in fasting&#x2F;calorie restriction.
评论 #16301420 未加载
评论 #16301199 未加载
wallflowerover 7 years ago
Someone on HN mentioned this paper in another thread about life extension. I find it fascinating that old age can be explained as redundant system breakdown and eventually failure.<p>&gt; Reliability theory is a general theory about systems failure. It allows researchers to predict the age-related failure kinetics for a system of given architecture (reliability structure) and given reliability of its components. Reliability theory predicts that even those systems that are entirely composed of non-aging elements (with a constant failure rate) will nevertheless deteriorate (fail more often) with age, if these systems are redundant in irreplaceable elements. Aging, therefore, is a direct consequence of systems redundancy. Reliability theory also predicts the late-life mortality deceleration with subsequent leveling-off, as well as the late-life mortality plateaus, as an inevitable consequence of redundancy exhaustion at extreme old ages. The theory explains why mortality rates increase exponentially with age (the Gompertz law) in many species, by taking into account the initial flaws (defects) in newly formed systems<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pubmed&#x2F;11742523" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;pubmed&#x2F;11742523</a>
megadethzover 7 years ago
Worlds youngest billionaire.
评论 #16301214 未加载
reasonattlmover 7 years ago
I think it important to note that the SENS research programs are just about 100% funded by philanthropy, with thousands of supporters over the years. This donation is a part of ~$6M from the year end fundraiser: about $500k from a lot of people in the community, Buterin&#x27;s donation, $2M from the Pineapple Fund, and $1M from an anonymous donor.<p>Needless to say everyone in the SENS community is very pleased by this unexpected generosity. These funds will go a long way towards helping to push allotopic expression of mitochondrial genes (remove the contribution of damaged mitochondria to aging) and cross-link breakers (remove stiffening of arteries and loss of elasticity in other tissues) to completion over the next couple of years, not to mention a range of other important projects in rejuvenation research.<p>It makes us think that we&#x27;re somewhere crucial in the tipping point for support and understanding of rejuvenation biotechnology as field.<p>--------<p>On this topic, I have a pet theory regarding wealth and its use to change the world. Historically, people who became extraordinarily wealthy have done so only after many years of work on projects that they were deeply invested in for the sake of the work, not for the sake of financial reward. Consequently they had no real idea regarding what to do with that wealth, other than to keep on moving forward in the shape that they had carved out for their lives prior to that enrichment. They became one with the process that brought them to where they were. Further, these were usually older people by that point, come to terms with the human condition, more comfortable with the world as it is, not as a younger and more fiery individual would have it be. Not everyone is worn down to acceptance - look at the large-scale, results-oriented philanthropy of Bill Gates, for example - but I think it is definitely the case that vision is often one of the early casualties of aging, and the advent of personal wealth doesn&#x27;t change that situation for any given individual. For every Bill Gates there are another twenty billionaires who fail to change the world in any significant way beyond the ventures that earned them their fortunes.<p>Cryptocurrencies, the first application of blockchain technologies, have resulted in a sizable number of people who have become enormously wealthy in a much shorter period of time, and at younger ages, than has typically been the case in the past. Even the dotcom bubble era and its immediate sequels didn&#x27;t reach these levels of youthful enrichment, and that produced a fair number of people young enough and wealthy enough to set forth to remake sections of the world in the service of loftier agendas. They escaped being shaped by the processes of their enrichment to a great enough degree to retain fire and vision. Consider the willingness to put capital towards world-changing futurist ideals exhibited by Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Mark Zuckerberg, and Sean Parker, to pick a few. But while that generation of high net worth individuals have certainly supported the life sciences, and in Peter Thiel&#x27;s case SENS rejuvenation research, they largely haven&#x27;t followed Thiel&#x27;s support for the goal of treating aging as a medical condition, and Thiel himself has certainly not gone all-in. He hasn&#x27;t followed the logic further towards its end, in that the only rational use for excess capital in this age is to develop viable treatments to reverse aging. When you can buy time with money, and not just for yourself, but for everyone, then that is the rational thing to do.<p>The wealthy of the blockchain community may well proceed differently. The times are different, for one, as rejuvenation research after the SENS model of damage repair is more broadly known and accepted nowadays. The technology industry of the Bay Area, still in many ways the spiritual center of modern software engineering and invention, includes a great many supporters of SENS, the Methuselah Foundation, and the SENS Research Foundation, and that number has grown considerably over the past fifteen years. Aging is an engineering problem, SENS is a set of repairs and a set of outlines for repair technologies, and engineers grasp that readily. It isn&#x27;t a coincidence that there are so many engineers, software and otherwise, to be found participating in the past fifteen years of philanthropy to support progress in rejuvenation research, work based on periodic repair of the cell and tissue damage that causes aging. Now it is the case that many of those engineers in the cryptocurrency space are both young and suddenly wealthy, people who have not been worn down to an acceptance of the world as it is, have not become one with their process of enrichment. They are still willing to consider radical change to the status quo, full of the fire of success, and equipped with sufficient resources to push forward the research and development that they would like to see happen. Exciting times.
评论 #16301030 未加载
ACow_Adonisover 7 years ago
How can i put this delicately but openly...<p>As an ignorant observer... is the SENS foundation viewed as alegitimate research org, or is it, to borrow a phrase coined by Djikstra...&quot;something that could only have been invented in southern california&quot;.
评论 #16301245 未加载
jrs95over 7 years ago
At first I thought this said &quot;SNES Foundation&quot; and I was <i>very</i> confused.
matt_wulfeckover 7 years ago
What would you do with more years added to your life? Probably spend it glued to your phone like the years you have now.
评论 #16301423 未加载
评论 #16301234 未加载
np_tediousover 7 years ago
Good kid, that Vitalik. Why can&#x27;t you be more like him, Johnny?
bloudermilkover 7 years ago
The idea that you can invent a crypto currency, mine the earliest (and therefore easiest-to-mine) tokens yourself, build a business&#x2F;community&#x2F;market, then get incredibly rich strikes me as incredibly shady. In theory it&#x27;s not that different from founding a company, selling some of the shares to investors, keeping &quot;founder shares&quot; for yourself, then growing the company. But somehow it seems much shadier?<p>I guess the difference is: in a company an investor can look at a cap table and say &quot;that&#x27;s a reasonable number of shares for the founders to keep&quot; whereas the coin &quot;investors&quot; can&#x27;t know how much of outstanding equity belongs to the founders.
评论 #16301180 未加载
mephitixover 7 years ago
I&#x27;ve never really understood why people consider aging to be a problem. I&#x27;m not sure if we as a civilization have been able to deal with overpopulation, at least looking at currently-overpopulated areas.<p>Personally, I would rather have an optimal life - one where I don&#x27;t have any diseases or ailments, so I can live life to the fullest, all the way up until death. So IMO, currently incurable or intractable things like cancer, Alzheimers, Parkinson&#x27;s, dementia, are more important.<p>If fixing &#x27;aging&#x27; can fix these issues, or if an aging fix is a side-effect of these issues (please enlighten me since I know nothing about aging research) then I would be fine with that - but would still be worried about overpopulation, whether it&#x27;s the rich or both the rich and poor.
评论 #16301056 未加载
评论 #16301100 未加载
评论 #16301079 未加载
评论 #16301046 未加载
评论 #16301108 未加载
评论 #16301050 未加载
评论 #16301024 未加载
评论 #16301116 未加载
评论 #16301025 未加载
goldenkeyover 7 years ago
The only reason he did this is because crypto has been crashing -- and public news like this will add new buyers to the crypto market. Considering his share of ethereum is worth billions -- by donating 0.01% he raises the rest by dozens of % points, effectively making him billions. Smart move.
评论 #16301165 未加载
评论 #16301159 未加载
评论 #16301219 未加载