This is fun and all, but if the message that this tries to pass along is "don't bother with proper security because it's very hard/impossible, do your best and ship, you can always fix your code", than that's bullshit. Secure coding is possible and is our responsability when we are writing code that others are meant to use somehow, and if most of the devs lack the formation in secure coding and if many companies don't ensure the code is secure to some standards, then that's not a law of the nature but instead our own sloppiness and laziness as an industry. Lucky we are that the world does not know yet how to hold us to a high enough standard.
Works perfectly with my favorite test framework: <a href="https://github.com/lxe/no-bugs" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/lxe/no-bugs</a>
Just for the record, a previous similar attempt, unfortunately discontinued, that was aimed to very compact code and interoperability on <i>all</i> Operating Systems:<p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130329160607/http://www.bernardbelanger.com/computing/NaDa/index.php" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/20130329160607/http://www.bernar...</a>
Performance is also a feature.
.NET version of the same (with benchmark): <a href="https://github.com/benaadams/System.Ben" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/benaadams/System.Ben</a>