TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Backblaze Announces B2 Compute Partnerships

209 pointsby willcodeforfooabout 7 years ago

16 comments

nolokabout 7 years ago
I see people from Blackblaze here, so let me ask: any chance we could get B2 integration in Synology&#x27;s Hyper Backup ?<p>I know you&#x27;re in Cloud Sync, but that&#x27;s really not the same thing (a one&#x2F;two way sync is not a backup service).<p>I&#x27;m not sure if you need to give Synology a nudge or something, and I would even pay a fee for it if need be, but until then I can&#x27;t use B2 as one my main backup destination for all those businesses NAS I have at various small sized companies I administrate.
评论 #16747508 未加载
评论 #16748103 未加载
评论 #16750929 未加载
budmangabout 7 years ago
We&#x27;re thrilled about this. In short, we&#x27;ve directly connected our storage and their compute to ensure fast connections, and made the data transfers free. We&#x27;ve heard some ways people want to use this (disaster recovery, transcoding, rendering) - but would love to hear ways that you might. Thank you!<p>Gleb from Backblaze
评论 #16746724 未加载
评论 #16746893 未加载
menegattigabout 7 years ago
Backblaze B2 is awesome and the future looks very promising. Their team is also very open to new ideas and projects.<p>We have few PB of data there and never had any problem.<p>I honestly don&#x27;t see any reason for anyone to use AWS or Google Cloud for object storage, except for the outbound network transfer issue from these providers.
评论 #16747016 未加载
bburhansabout 7 years ago
If Backblaze added simple, cheap functions-as-a-service, I&#x27;d switch everything away from the Big Three cloud providers and Auth0 except for fallback microservices. The biggest reason is bandwidth costs, which are disproportionately huge for small and medium businesses if there are more than a couple kilobytes of transfer per invocation.<p>That said, I am not super impressed by these first two compute providers, and probably would not trust them to give me enough nines even if they started doing FaaS. I can spin up something similar with Kubernetes on Hetzner for considerably less money...
评论 #16750285 未加载
jedbergabout 7 years ago
Wow nice! They figured out a way to successfully compete with Amazon by slowly backing into little corners of their space. Love it!
评论 #16747675 未加载
lewis1028282about 7 years ago
Can the people from Backblaze answer when they are going to accept payement in different currencies? My Backblaze bill is around $0.50 but my bank charges fees for conversion etc so the total paid is often around £2.50 or so. Would love if they’d accept bitcoin or Paypal&#x2F;Amazon or charge British pounds.
评论 #16748059 未加载
评论 #16749611 未加载
评论 #16753871 未加载
评论 #16751831 未加载
评论 #16748002 未加载
eroppleabout 7 years ago
B2 is interesting, and the price for object storage is pretty competitive. I wrote my stuff against S3&#x27;s API, particularly for DO Spaces, but DO&#x27;s fairly epic pants-crapping this week has me nervous.<p>My use case is download-heavy, though, and a little bit bursty (but with a long tail, a CDN doesn&#x27;t really address my needs); what sort of bandwidth speeds can I expect from downloading B2 when a decent number of clients, let&#x27;s say 100-500, are hitting a single object concurrently?
评论 #16752220 未加载
评论 #16749560 未加载
评论 #16748600 未加载
_Soulouabout 7 years ago
Is there any plan for a European presence? (At least, for the storage part)
评论 #16747162 未加载
评论 #16747212 未加载
评论 #16747662 未加载
e12eabout 7 years ago
Was anyone able to figure out what bandwidth&#x2F;data is included with the packet.net &quot;tiny&quot;? It&#x27;s roughly 50 usd&#x2F;month and lists dual 1gps uplink - but I couldn&#x27;t see anything about bandwidth. Eg hetzner will include ~30tb&#x2F;month with a gbps uplink - or roughly 45 gb&#x2F;hour or 100 mbps sustained.<p>Given the other prices packet.net lists for bandwidth (Starting at 0.05&#x2F;gb) i assume it&#x27;s <i>not</i> unmetered (that&#x27;s about 300 tb for 1 gbps for a month).
评论 #16749172 未加载
评论 #16749491 未加载
smoyerabout 7 years ago
Packet wants me to contact them for a quote? I like BackBlaze&#x27;s transparent pricing but won&#x27;t be pairing Packet&#x27;s compute service with it. Sorry.
评论 #16748340 未加载
评论 #16748914 未加载
评论 #16749078 未加载
评论 #16749448 未加载
Nullabillityabout 7 years ago
Why single out these two providers? Shared parent company? Are they paying out of some marketing budget? Cheaper peering for some reason?
评论 #16748014 未加载
manigandhamabout 7 years ago
This is great news, looks very interesting for data warehouse scenarios now with something like Spark or Drill. Are there any specs on throughput available to compute on Packet?<p>Side note: never heard of SlicingDice before but their website doesn&#x27;t seem to be working, getting a cloudflare site offline page.
评论 #16750145 未加载
baybal2about 7 years ago
Still can&#x27;t beat a place in colo with few own transcode servers with FPGAs or transcoding asics.
byefruitabout 7 years ago
What kind of performance are people seeing against B2?<p>I wonder how realistic running analytics over stored data is.
评论 #16750193 未加载
byranthectorabout 7 years ago
Yes! Bare metal power and Backblaze affordability! I so need this!
评论 #16746845 未加载
biasforactionabout 7 years ago
I&#x27;ve been a big fan of Backblaze for several years now. I&#x27;ll make sure to stop by your booth at NAB and express my nerdy appreciation for your service.
评论 #16749689 未加载