> We will reject Apps for any content or behavior that we believe is over the line. What line, you ask? Well, as a Supreme Court Justice once said, “I’ll know it when I see it”. And we think that you will also know it when you cross it.<p>The proper quote, from Justice Potter Stevens, was:<p>> I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But <i></i>I know it when I see it<i></i>, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.<p>How do I know? Because by wild coincidence, I quote it on the first page of a free book I wrote (<a href="http://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/book/metaheuristics/" rel="nofollow">http://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/book/metaheuristics/</a>).
On April:<p><i>"My opinion is that iPhone users will be well-served by this rule. The App Store is not lacking for quantity of titles."</i> (He's talking about 3.1.1)<p><a href="http://daringfireball.net/2010/04/why_apple_changed_section_331" rel="nofollow">http://daringfireball.net/2010/04/why_apple_changed_section_...</a><p>Today, he doesn't comment on 3.1.1 but says <i>"The existence of this document is a very welcome change"</i> regarding the rules document. I'd like to see some comments on 3.1.1 as well.
>This is a living document, and new apps presenting new questions may result in new rules at any time. Perhaps your app will trigger this.<p>In other words - you (still) can't use this list to see if your app will be accepted. Only whether it will be rejected with certainty.<p>This isn't unexpected, but as long as apple works hard to make this the only way to install your apps, it is still unacceptable.