TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

A Long-Sought Proof, Found and Almost Lost (2017)

116 pointsby taytusabout 7 years ago

8 comments

danbrucabout 7 years ago
Previous discussion [1], 71 comments.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13977554" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13977554</a>
xyzzyzabout 7 years ago
&gt; With this red flag emblazoned on it, the proof continued to be ignored. Finally, in December 2015, the Polish mathematician Rafał Latała and his student Dariusz Matlak put out a paper advertising Royen’s proof, reorganizing it in a way some people found easier to follow.<p>I studied Probability Theory under prof. dr hab. Rafał Latała. He is a great researcher and amazing teacher.
Cyph0nabout 7 years ago
This was an amazing read!<p>Decades were spent applying exceedingly complex mathematical techniques, but in the end, the proof involved relatively rudimentary knowledge. And to top it all off, Royen submitted his proof to some unknown journal in India and called it a day!
danharajabout 7 years ago
I&#x27;m glad quanta touched on the fact that people still want a more geometric proof. In general the technique of a proof is as important as the statement with regards to mathematical impact, perhaps even more.
claarabout 7 years ago
The wikipedia diagram at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Gaussian_correlation_inequality" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Gaussian_correlation_inequalit...</a> helps gain an intuition for the Gaussian correlation inequality. The diagram shows a circle and a rectangle centered on the origin.<p>The number of random dart throws in the intersection of the shapes is greater than or equal to the number in either individual shape.<p>Well, sort of. The wikipedia page says &quot;the proportion of the darts landing in the intersection of both shapes is no less than the product of the proportions of the darts landing in each shape.&quot;
评论 #16889948 未加载
mabboabout 7 years ago
Stories like this always remind me of how much we as a society love the story of unexpected loners figuring out the secret. There&#x27;s nothing wrong with that, but there also some wonderful breakthroughs being made by groups of people working together.<p>I&#x27;d love to see a film about someone like Terrence Tao, a man best known for all the breakthroughs coming from collaborations.
sn41about 7 years ago
I wonder about the &quot;red flag&quot; discussed in the article. Can&#x27;t editors submit articles to journals with them on the editorial board? I&#x27;d think that it is valid to submit to other editors.
评论 #16889790 未加载
J5892about 7 years ago
Non-AMP link: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;04&#x2F;elusive-math-proof-found-almost-lost&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;04&#x2F;elusive-math-proof-found-almos...</a>
评论 #16888318 未加载