@chrisv_au's response [1] also merits concern:<p>> Maybe @eventbrite should explain why they sent no official communications about changes to their t&c's - either to add this section, or to remove it.<p>[1] <a href="https://twitter.com/chrisv_au/status/988195013308772353?s=20" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/chrisv_au/status/988195013308772353?s=20</a>
For a non-jerky-you-around-y ticketing option, try <a href="https://lilregie.com" rel="nofollow">https://lilregie.com</a> -- it's a bootstrapped (self-funded) startup from the folks behind the Webstock conference. They built Lil Regie to meet their ticketing needs, offered it to the world, and have been adding features ever since. I have no equity, am just a happy customer.
Gotta appreciate the promptness of the response here. I think a lot of EULA's are insanely overbroad, and my hope is companies start thinking twice before granting themselves various rights.
For background, see:<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16896396" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16896396</a>
if the event is in public, and they do the recording, is this clause even necessary? they already have the rights to their recording of you in public (not talking about the bat shit insane part about you being responsible for copyright on the content they are recording, like background music)
To be honest this seems like lawyers being lawyers and EventBrite rectifying the situation promptly when they knew, and clarifying it had never happened IRL.<p>OP still not happy unless they go out of the way to shame themselves rather than generically referring to the issue?