TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Mainframes and Supercomputers, From the Beginning Till Today

85 pointsby stargravealmost 7 years ago

8 comments

skissanealmost 7 years ago
&gt; The first mainframe was created by the well-known IBM in 1964<p>Were the IBM 700&#x2F;7000 series (1953-1964) not mainframes? I would say they were.<p>And what about other vendors pre-1964 machines, e.g. UNIVACs. Were they not mainframes too?<p>&gt; you need to determine what the super-computer differs from the mainframe and which is faster<p>I&#x27;m not convinced that &quot;mainframe&quot; and &quot;supercomputer&quot; are necessarily mutually exclusive categories. What about the IBM 7030 Stretch? Doesn&#x27;t it belong to both?<p>There have been supercomputers with an S&#x2F;360-descended architecture. For example, the Fujitsu FACOM VP and VP2200 series, the Hitachi HITAC S-810. Such machines were both supercomputers and IBM-compatible mainframes, and could run variants of MVS.
评论 #17170782 未加载
apple4everalmost 7 years ago
Very cool.<p>I wish I was able to locate a Thinking Machines CM-5 before they were all destroyed. Even the front indicator panel would have been nice.<p>I’ve created my own smaller version with an Arduino and some LED panels but its not the same.
评论 #17170766 未加载
jgelseyalmost 7 years ago
Disappointing it does not mention Convex Computer, which:<p>-produced the world&#x27;s first commercially available gallium arsenide supercomputer, the Convex C3<p>-owned the minisupercomputer market from ~1986 through its end in 1995<p>-built the first commercially successful flat address space, cache coherent massively parallel processor the SPP1000 series in &#x27;94
评论 #17171240 未加载
评论 #17172783 未加载
ordualmost 7 years ago
<i>&gt; During the first month of IBM, orders were received for more than a thousand copies of such machines, and in the 6 years of the family’s existence, more than 33,000 such machines were sold.</i><p>What for? I can imagine some tasks for such a machine in the middle of XX century, but not for thousands of them.
评论 #17169233 未加载
评论 #17169664 未加载
评论 #17169392 未加载
评论 #17170329 未加载
madengralmost 7 years ago
It’s evident, scrolling through that, how drab computers have become. The 360 had a giant control panel with blinken lights, and cool looking tape drives. The Cray looks cool, despite the lack of control panel. Everything else is just a drab rack.
评论 #17170884 未加载
评论 #17169986 未加载
评论 #17173263 未加载
kev009almost 7 years ago
This is kind of a scatterbrained article, it doesn&#x27;t tie in mainframes in a meaningful way. The CDC 6600 and IBM 7030 Strech would have been a better starting point for supers. The S&#x2F;360 mainframe was primarily a business line of computers, although the 360&#x2F;91 was a capable super.<p>So to expand on mainframes in particular, which are less well documented&#x2F;understood by my generation:<p>The IBM mainframe continued being primarily a business computer but they often had enhanced capability models like the 3090 with optional vector facilities that put them in competition with dedicated supercomputers.<p>Few people that came into computing in the 1990s and thereafter realize that a lot of what we might assume to be &quot;modern&quot; capabilities existed since the 1970s, via these machines. The machines gave companies inter-office memos (email), document preparation (word) and document&#x2F;image storage (like modern dropbox, gdrive etc), OLTP (like later RDBMS oracle etc), OLAP (like modern hadoop, terradata etc), custom applications and hardware for all kinds of line of business activities like automated logistics via bar code systems, point of sales cash registers and bar code scanners, ATMs, complex billing generators printers that could customize&#x2F;cut&#x2F;collate bills and notices, bill processors with check printers&#x2F;OCR scanners, phone switchboard integration for call routing and auto-attendant etc.<p>VTAM and SNA allowed the machines to communicate, and intercommunicate with machines of other companies across the globe. Time sharing services were offered for smaller companies in a way not dissimilar to modern &quot;cloud computing&quot;. International networks existed to interchange data between different computer types like <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Tymnet" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Tymnet</a>.<p>The machines were also critical to the design and engineering of large construction, manufacturing, PLM, and simulation. Aircraft, ship building, power plant design, space exploration, automotive, circuit board and VLSI chip design&#x2F;layout&#x2F;EDA.. all that was primarily done on these machines up until the early &#x27;90s when UNIX workstations took over. CADAM, CATIA etc lots of good history covered on <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;mbinfo.mbdesign.net&#x2F;CAD-History.htm" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;mbinfo.mbdesign.net&#x2F;CAD-History.htm</a>.<p>It&#x27;s actually kind of astounding how much these did and how quickly it was washed out of common knowledge. If you had a white collar job in the &#x27;70s-early &#x27;90s you probably directly and indirectly spent a lot of time on these machines. 3270 terminals and later PCs with 3270 emulation.<p>Today, the mainframe is still integral to the running of Western civilization, although they are almost exclusively back office transaction processing and batch reporting systems.
analog31almost 7 years ago
The table at the end of the article, showing roughly Teraflops as a function of year. I&#x27;d be interested to see a corresponding table for minicomputers, microcomputers and other desktop machines such as GPU&#x27;s.
stevep001almost 7 years ago
I&#x27;m sorry, but an article claiming to trace the history of supercomputers that doesn&#x27;t even mention the CDC 6600 can&#x27;t be taken seriously.
评论 #17170258 未加载