TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Canon has sold its last film camera

296 pointsby gringoDanalmost 7 years ago

11 comments

ccnafralmost 7 years ago
Original source: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;petapixel.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;05&#x2F;30&#x2F;canon-is-now-out-of-the-film-camera-business-after-80-years&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;petapixel.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;05&#x2F;30&#x2F;canon-is-now-out-of-the-fil...</a><p>I&#x27;m so tired of the TechCrunch blog spam on this site. They&#x27;ve literally stolen another site&#x27;s news story and HN mods never replace their links with the original source of the article.<p>Why is this site always given a pass for content theft?
评论 #17201249 未加载
评论 #17201320 未加载
评论 #17201222 未加载
评论 #17201579 未加载
snowwrestleralmost 7 years ago
I&#x27;m not surprised; in SLRs at least, Canon was never the dominant film camera company with the biggest customer base. Their SLR business did not catch up to and pass Nikon until the digital era.<p>Canon&#x27;s decision to put the AF motor in the lens helped them in verticals that use huge telephotos (sports, mostly). But their film cameras lagged Nikon in the sophistication of their AF, their automated exposure control, and especially their flash exposure control. These were all big deals in the era when every frame was precious and mistakes were hidden until it&#x27;s too late (after the film was developed).<p>In digital cameras their AF system is now on par, and auto exposure is just less important in general because of the ease of reviewing and post-processing for exposure. They started moving past Nikon about 15 years ago by creating sensors that were cheaper, larger, and had lower noise. Since then they have filled in gaps in their lens lines, and used their expertise in video, to maintain their lead.
评论 #17198825 未加载
评论 #17197678 未加载
评论 #17197496 未加载
评论 #17198677 未加载
acomjeanalmost 7 years ago
As someone who shot and developed a lot of film (I was a photo editor at a daily college paper..) I won’t miss it. Though printing black and white pictures was kinda fun, they often had dust and getting the exporsure and contrast right was tedious.<p>I don’t miss film.<p>Though there were a lot less pictures taken and shared before everyone had a camera on their phone. A different time in a lot of ways.
评论 #17200931 未加载
评论 #17197666 未加载
评论 #17197582 未加载
jccalhounalmost 7 years ago
&quot;The model in question is the EOS-1V, which, incidentally, the company actually stopped making a full eight years ago. Since it has simply been selling out the rest of its stock, which, it seems, has finally depleted.&quot;<p>That says a lot about how few they have been selling.
评论 #17198374 未加载
评论 #17197806 未加载
评论 #17199499 未加载
评论 #17197664 未加载
mauvehausalmost 7 years ago
This is a shame. For professionals, it has long made sense to make the transition to digital. For the amateurs of the world and those of us doing it for the sheer joy of it, film is unsurpassed.<p>Developing B&amp;W prints is as close to magic as I&#x27;ve experienced. For those who don&#x27;t know, B&amp;W paper isn&#x27;t sensitive to red light, so once you&#x27;ve exposed the paper, you can put it in the developer and actually <i>watch the image appear</i>. Plus there&#x27;s something about the smell of a darkroom. The hot lamps of the enlargers create a smell that mixes with the smell of the fixer and the stop bath that&#x27;s unmistakable.<p>Would I want to do any of this if I were shooting weddings? Definitely not. If I&#x27;m taking my camera for a walk and want to see what I&#x27;ve captured, absolutely!<p>The other thing that&#x27;s a damned shame is the way the manufacturing has changed. I&#x27;ve long been a Pentax man, and the old Super-Takumar and Super-Multi-Coated (as distinct from the later SMC) lenses are a pleasure to use[0].<p>Everything about the way they fall to hand is perfect, and the machining is immaculate. The focus ring is scalloped and knurled, and it&#x27;s <i>metal</i>. They must have cost a fortune to make. The SMC, K, M, and I&#x27;d assume the A series lenses have a lot more plastic on the outside of the lenses, but the feel of the focusing helix is still beyond reproach. Modern lenses, by comparison, are made so that they can be driven by the autofocus mechanisms, and the feel of the ring in manual mode is terrible.<p>That isn&#x27;t to say that the modern lenses are optically worse; I&#x27;m sure the situation is quite the opposite. Nonetheless, something has been lost. Again all of this is moot for most people looking for the most productivity out of their tools, or for the people shooting casually. The small group of people in the middle, they&#x27;ll miss it.<p>Honestly, it&#x27;s like CD (or any other digital medium) vs records. Records are quantitatively worse by any measure, but for the sheer pleasure of the experience, they can&#x27;t be matched. If I want to sit down and actually listen to music, part of the enjoyment is the smell of the record and its sleeve, and the tangible process of putting the needle on the record.<p>[0] Super Takumar and SMC Takumars here: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.prairierimimages.com&#x2F;2011&#x2F;08&#x2F;old-glass-asahipentax-smc-super-takumar.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.prairierimimages.com&#x2F;2011&#x2F;08&#x2F;old-glass-asahipent...</a> The Super-Multi-Coated Takumars are essentially identical from the outside.
评论 #17198165 未加载
评论 #17198031 未加载
评论 #17198098 未加载
评论 #17198090 未加载
评论 #17197981 未加载
评论 #17198242 未加载
评论 #17197953 未加载
jacquesmalmost 7 years ago
My brother is a photographer and works in a camera store in his spare time - or the other way around, depending on when you ask him.<p>He&#x27;s spent a fortune over the years on film and cameras and switched to full digital a while ago. Recently he traded all his glass &amp; bodies for new Sony gear, which he reckons outperforms both Canon and Nikon by a considerable margin. So if you&#x27;re letting go of film and are in the market for digital don&#x27;t count out Sony.
评论 #17198269 未加载
评论 #17198100 未加载
_ph_almost 7 years ago
This is not very surprising news - very recently I was wondering who still sells film cameras. Digital has surpassed film in almost every way. It is however quite scary to see technology completely go away which was so common not long ago, sometimes even completely lost as technology. You can’t buy proper Polaroid film any more, many other important film materials are completely gone as well.
评论 #17197829 未加载
评论 #17197958 未加载
评论 #17198061 未加载
mvexelalmost 7 years ago
I&#x27;m seriously curious how they were able to sell that last inventory. Folks buying them for nostalgic reasons? Was there a real market left for top of the line film SLRs that wasn&#x27;t served by the used camera market? You can get really good used ones for not very much money.<p>As a film shooter for 20+ years, I decided to break out my old Nikon FA and shoot a roll of film today to mark the occasion. (I still keep some in the fridge, Velvia 50 Daylight.) I wonder if the last place that would still develop slide film around here last time I needed film developed still does it. If they still take film, they probably ship it some place to get it developed rather than do it in-house like they used to.
chuckkiralmost 7 years ago
I was talking to a friend who recently got into 35mm film cameras. He develops the color film himself, but then immediately scans it in and uses digital tools to work on the images. I left a bit confused; what is he gaining by using film as the medium?
评论 #17200146 未加载
评论 #17199509 未加载
评论 #17201099 未加载
mathewsandersalmost 7 years ago
When I was 16 (1997) a photographer friend of my parents gave me his old Canon AE-1 (I think released in 1980 or 81) it’s shutter wasn’t working and I took it into the local Canon center where they fixed the shutter, replaced light seal on film door, and even gave me a lens cap for something like NZD$50.<p>Amazing that companies used to build such sturdy products that they could be cheaply fixed 15+ years after they were sold...<p>Also sort of amazing is that Canon even had a physical presence that as a consumer I could visit a physical offices and drop of a product in person to be fixed!
评论 #17202428 未加载
sofaofthedamnedalmost 7 years ago
I don&#x27;t understand why Google &#x2F; MS &#x2F; Amazon etc don&#x27;t buy either of Nikon or Canon? It&#x27;d give them credibility and they&#x27;d immediately improve the DSLRs. Imagine a decent Nikon with the Google Photos processing? Decent wifi? Regular updates?
评论 #17197625 未加载
评论 #17197766 未加载
评论 #17197623 未加载