Why only GitHub? Is it because of MVP? For this to really stand out for me it would include more major repository sites like Gitlab and maybe even personal project servers so it could become the go-to place to find projects. Especially since the exodus caused by the GitHub debacle a few weeks ago.
Great idea, but why in the world do you require so many write privileges??<p>This application will be able to read and write all public repository data. This includes the following:<p>Code
Issues
Pull requests
Wikis
Settings
Webhooks and services
Deploy keys
I don't see the need for more visibility of github hosted projects.
Many self-hosted projects on the other hand could profit from an aggregator.<p>feedback: I had a hard time using the site until I whitelisted dozens of third-party css, images, js, cookies, frames and XHRs. The umatrix list is HUGE.
Great idea, but I find a bit ironic that "I Code Dis" can’t be submitted to itself because it’s not open-source. Do you plan to open the code at some point?
Very nice, thanks for creating and sharing this.<p>If I may make a suggestion, can you tweak the layout/design for a better mobile experience?<p>I can only read the first three or so words about the repos when scrolling through the list.<p><a href="https://i.imgur.com/8sjvAlo.jpg" rel="nofollow">https://i.imgur.com/8sjvAlo.jpg</a>
I wish we as an industry would agree on an icon standard. I noticed SourceTree for MacOS looks for `icon.png/jpg/gif` in the root folder of a project.<p><a href="https://i.imgur.com/9MGwVv4.png" rel="nofollow">https://i.imgur.com/9MGwVv4.png</a><p>I wish github, gitlab, this and other repo related software displayed those by default. Less work, more fun
Sorry to ask that annoying question that people tend to ask, but how does this differ from <a href="https://github.com/trending" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/trending</a>?