TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

FCC sides with Google Fiber over Comcast with new pro-competition rule

258 pointsby ricwalmost 7 years ago

10 comments

cjhanksalmost 7 years ago
Politics aside, of course.<p>The administration continues to act in removing Federal jurisdiction and regulations from being used as a tool to prevent startup organizations from entering established markets.<p>This case is a success in that it removes significant incumbent advantages. Let&#x27;s hope poor behavior and sloppy work (breaking connections too frequently) doesn&#x27;t become common. And shame on the incumbents using regulations for financial gain.
评论 #17679198 未加载
评论 #17678659 未加载
评论 #17677811 未加载
评论 #17677997 未加载
Judsonalmost 7 years ago
Interesting to see this decision today, as I was just speaking with my Google Fiber tech about their Nashville rollout.<p>Apparently there was so much heel dragging pole access, they ended up laying their fiber in tiny channels cut into the road.<p>As an aside, I also heard the channels weren&#x27;t cut deep enough initially, so they were forced to go back and redo part of the work after much of it was considered complete.
collinfalmost 7 years ago
Is Google Fiber still expanding? Last I heard it was pretty much cut.
评论 #17676901 未加载
评论 #17677561 未加载
评论 #17676876 未加载
评论 #17678967 未加载
GW150914almost 7 years ago
Am I just grotesquely cynical that my first thought was “Pai liked this because it hurts AT&amp;T and Comcast, not his paymasters at Verizon.”?<p>Still, good news whatever the reason. Competition is desperately needed here, even if it’s only going to be between three or four major options.
评论 #17676691 未加载
评论 #17677163 未加载
ww520almost 7 years ago
More competition is good news. Even if Google doesn&#x27;t push Google Fiber hard enough, it serves as precedence for other competitors to come in.
ikirisalmost 7 years ago
I&#x27;ll admit, this one surprised me. I didn&#x27;t expect the new admin to support it.
评论 #17677641 未加载
评论 #17677726 未加载
safgasCVSalmost 7 years ago
Go figure. Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn now and then
评论 #17681666 未加载
dev_dullalmost 7 years ago
&gt; <i>FCC Chairman Ajit Pai rejected this argument, saying that startups are unnecessarily delayed when they have to wait for incumbent ISPs before hanging wires.</i><p>I thought I was supposed to not like this guy.
评论 #17676732 未加载
评论 #17676736 未加载
评论 #17676717 未加载
评论 #17676863 未加载
syshumalmost 7 years ago
&gt;&gt;Verizon supported OTMR,<p>hmmm... The &quot;Former&quot; Verizon Lawyer supported Verizon&#x27;s position.... I am shocked I tell you....
nashashmialmost 7 years ago
This is bad. I love google fiber and see that what they are trying to do is valid but when one utility company touches another company&#x27;s facilities it compromises the other facility and makes it vulnerable for service disruption.<p>But the regulation to ban or allow should not come at the Federal level. It should be governed by the utility pole owner.<p>In NYC for example con Ed owns a large number of poles. And then Verizon owns the next number of poles. Verizon and other utility companies pay ConEd based on how high their utility is placed. If it&#x27;s a Verizon pole, Verizon will put their facility on the very top and spectrum will put their facility on the lower part.<p>This means that another utility company cannot just come and move someone else&#x27;s facility around.
评论 #17677154 未加载
评论 #17677213 未加载
评论 #17677301 未加载
评论 #17677585 未加载
评论 #17677188 未加载