TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The next ten years of Instapaper

153 pointsby chmarsalmost 7 years ago

19 comments

jakobeggeralmost 7 years ago
Since they don&#x27;t seem to bother actually sharing their ten year plan, let me share what I want their ten year plan to be:<p>- We&#x27;re planning no new user visible features. Instapaper will continue to work just the way you&#x27;ve grown to like it, and we&#x27;re not planning to change stuff around.<p>- We&#x27;re working on making text extraction even more reliable. Besides blog posts and news articles, we hope to improve text extraction from PDFs, slide decks or even twitter threads. Whatever textual content you find on the web, with Instapaper you can save it for distraction free reading, now or later.<p>- Our apps will see ongoing development to improve compatibility (eg. support new devices&#x2F;OS updates as they come out), but no major new features. Quality assurance will be our top priority.<p>- and last but not least, our goal is to establish a small, but profitable company to keep the project alive! Besides the technical aspects, our new business plan will make sure that we&#x27;re thinking ahead and that we&#x27;re never caught off guard by something like the GDPR again.
评论 #17711505 未加载
_frogalmost 7 years ago
It feels weird to me that they’re putting those monetisation hooks back in without talking at all about the future of the product. I’ve used Instapaper for many years now, and I’m more than happy to pay for a service that I get so much value out of, but that said, Instapaper’s largely stagnated in recent years, with very little in the way of major updates or improvements. I’d really love to see even a rough roadmap that could give me some idea of where they want to be say, a year from now, but right now I don’t have a ton of confidence.
评论 #17707367 未加载
评论 #17707915 未加载
评论 #17709126 未加载
评论 #17706652 未加载
drexlspiveyalmost 7 years ago
I switched to emailthis after the EU fiasco. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.emailthis.me&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.emailthis.me&#x2F;</a><p>You get a parsed html email with the article without the adds. It literally supports every app there is for saving (you just share via email). You can read it from any email client and easily share it with your friends. I also use fastmail which has a great full text search so finding old articles is a breeze. You can also do many cool stuff with IFTTT because again, it&#x27;s just email.
评论 #17709542 未加载
lkurusaalmost 7 years ago
Good to see the 6 months Premium for EU users, but I am still unconvinced; I switched to Pocket after the GDPR fiasco, is there any reason to switch back?
评论 #17706515 未加载
评论 #17708412 未加载
评论 #17709113 未加载
评论 #17706504 未加载
AJRFalmost 7 years ago
Read-it-later software seems surprisingly hard to monetize given how few are in the space. Pocket, Instapaper and Pinboard seem to be the only valid players.<p>The ability to facilitate &quot;archiving a webpage&quot; seems to be simple, but read-it-later software needs to be more than that to the modern internet user it seems.<p>It needs to; + Save video and images + Most people require a TTS service of sorts + Even more people want text-extraction (and boy-oh-boy this is hard) + Cross-platform apps &amp; syncing<p>Where are the big costs here? Is it;<p>1. Scale (Syncing all that multimedia must be expensive) 2. Talent (doubt it&#x27;s this all the teams seem to be extremely small teams) 3. AI &amp; Scraping development (Most services are poor in their offerings here, not sure its this)<p>I&#x27;ve been thinking about the space a LOT and started to try and develop some pieces of software that eventually I hope people will be able to stitch together into something great.<p>When i&#x27;ve observed problems like this before it seems that eventually a large open source project comes along and kills the markets chance of generating any money, and read-it-later services seem to fit in that fuzzily-defined-in-my-head-only market segment.
subbzalmost 7 years ago
After all these comments stating that they changed to Pocket I find it important to point out we also have an self-hosted and open source alternative to these 2:<p>Wallabag (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wallabag.org&#x2F;en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wallabag.org&#x2F;en</a>)<p>Unfortunately it&#x27;s very hard to set Wallabag up without having access to VirtualHosts.
评论 #17708738 未加载
jseligeralmost 7 years ago
I subscribed. I don&#x27;t need the premium features, but I also use Instapaper just about every day and want the company to survive.
评论 #17709121 未加载
sidcoolalmost 7 years ago
Did I miss something or was there no mention of the plans for the next ten years?
评论 #17707375 未加载
skiman10almost 7 years ago
Well this is kind of annoying. They gave out premium to everyone when Pinterest bought them, but now that they are a private company again they took away features from me that I was used to using as a free user. I get why, but it still rubs me the wrong way. Reminds me of the PushBullet monetization stuff[0].<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.pushbullet.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;11&#x2F;17&#x2F;introducing-pushbullet-pro&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.pushbullet.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;11&#x2F;17&#x2F;introducing-pushbulle...</a>
_susanooalmost 7 years ago
Straight from their privacy policy [0]:<p>-- Please note: To ensure easy account creation, minimal customer errors, and reduced support inquiries, Instapaper accounts initially do not have passwords. If left without a password, anyone can access your account if they know or guess your username. --<p>This sounds like a serious security issue if you ask me.<p>[0] = <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.instapaper.com&#x2F;privacy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.instapaper.com&#x2F;privacy</a>
评论 #17706571 未加载
评论 #17706748 未加载
评论 #17709547 未加载
henryajalmost 7 years ago
Are there any decent alternatives to Instapaper? Pocket is the obvious one, but doesn&#x27;t have highlights (which I rely on).
评论 #17707218 未加载
评论 #17706759 未加载
评论 #17709101 未加载
评论 #17711455 未加载
drrobalmost 7 years ago
As a UK user it&#x27;s just nice to finally have it back. Good to know things are still going swimmingly despite the GDPR setbacks.
q-basealmost 7 years ago
I would have loved&#x2F;expected a short explanation as to why GDPR compliance took so long to achieve.<p>I really love Instapaper and use it a lot. Especially the send to kindle feature. Luckily for them I did not stumble upon an easy 1:1 replacement.<p>But not even explaining the challenges seems quite a bit off and suspect. It is not like I keep my health records there (at least to my knowledge :) )
评论 #17706825 未加载
评论 #17706597 未加载
评论 #17708629 未加载
评论 #17706560 未加载
评论 #17706620 未加载
jazzdogalmost 7 years ago
How about making it anything less than painful to use on an iPad. Like, maybe some of your developers can actually try to use it on an iPad? If this has been fixed, I retract. I&#x27;ve moved on long ago.
charlietango592almost 7 years ago
Do they expect to have any EU user after being out 2 months? I&#x27;ve been chatting with the support and I heard only the classic &quot;soon&quot;.
评论 #17706607 未加载
评论 #17709129 未加载
anotheryoualmost 7 years ago
so full text search is payed again. i love that feature, but it&#x27;s not worth 30 bucks a year to me.
aniket12almost 7 years ago
For someone who only wants a free service, which is better - Pocket or Instapaper?
评论 #17707014 未加载
评论 #17707212 未加载
canuckintimealmost 7 years ago
Meanwhile, Instapaper just killed their Apple Watch app: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.idownloadblog.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;08&#x2F;03&#x2F;instapaper-apple-watch-app-removal&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.idownloadblog.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;08&#x2F;03&#x2F;instapaper-apple-wat...</a>
评论 #17706511 未加载
评论 #17706710 未加载
antjanusalmost 7 years ago
Can someone compare Instapaper to Pocket for me? I&#x27;m just wondering how they&#x27;re different.