Look nice but:<p>- Needs to have a search (that lists sections found, lets you skip between finds, etc.)<p>- Needs index, even though tabs are nice<p>- scrollbar in middle of page != friendly (use vertical space in page and page scroll)
Why is this version more useable than the already available versions?<p>I prefer the text version myself. I can use it in more places than this HTML version.
To debug my wiki engine, I did some experiment with RFCs.<p>RFCs as wikis: <a href="http://simpliwiki.com/yours/SomeRfcs" rel="nofollow">http://simpliwiki.com/yours/SomeRfcs</a><p>This is an other definition of "usable" I guess.<p>I added an orange visual cue when scrolling, to make it easier to spot where new content starts.
Have a look at the html source... some <a href="http://www.intelli-computing.com/wordpress/?super_sale=DDDD" rel="nofollow">http://www.intelli-computing.com/wordpress/?super_sale=DDDD</a> code in there...
Great idea. Weak implementation. Compared to even the TXT version that's my top Google hit for [rfc2616], this is harder to search and fits less text into the same sized viewport. (Devoting ~40% of the viewport to informationless deepCyan background isn't very helpful.)