TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Google GKE: Local SSD disk performance is worse than standard persistent disk

3 pointsby siddontangalmost 7 years ago

1 comment

siddontangalmost 7 years ago
We use fio<p><pre><code> fio -ioengine=psync -bs=32k -fdatasync=1 -thread -rw=write -size=10G -filename=test -name=&quot;PingCAP max throughput&quot; -iodepth=4 -runtime=60 -numjobs=1 -group_reporting </code></pre> and find that local disk has a bad performance than persistent disk.<p>A detailed report <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.google.com&#x2F;document&#x2F;d&#x2F;1OP1VnGlQx__jW2i8sLfmZWqfbVtRgqQIx2K98sMG3UA&#x2F;edit" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.google.com&#x2F;document&#x2F;d&#x2F;1OP1VnGlQx__jW2i8sLfmZWqf...</a><p>Btw, if we remove -fdatasync=1 and use -direct=1 to bypass page cache, the local SSD disk has a better performance.<p>Interesting. Does anyone know about it?