TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN:properties of real numbers

2 pointsby pencilover 14 years ago
Hello, The addition property of real numbers says if a=b,c=d then a+c=b+d.can someone tell me why is it true? is there an algebraic proof for this or should we accept this as being true based on inductive reasoning?i really tried doing a google search for a proof but couldn't find any. (i know i had asked a similer question a couple of days ago but i feel i might get a much more reasonable answer to this one..may be the way i had put accross the question wasn't sensible)

7 comments

gdlover 14 years ago
Informal reasoning: in a=b, the 'a' and 'b' are merely placeholders that act as pointers to the same underlying value, so they can be used interchangeably. It's no different than referring to "seven" and "the integer directly following six" - I could use either reference any place I could use the other with no effect on the overall statement. Ditto for c=d. All that is happening with a+c=b+d is that two references to values are being changed to different references with <i>the exact same underlying values</i>, so the result is necessarily the same.<p>See also <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_axioms" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_axioms</a> if you prefer the math and logic jargon. High school geometry taught me to dislike dealing with formal proofs, but I think that should be about the right area to look.
评论 #1794024 未加载
patio11over 14 years ago
There are a bunch of ways to prove this. Let's start with addition, subtraction, equality being commutative, that a + 0 = a, and that a - a = 0<p>Suppose that d != a - b + c. Since a = b, a - b = 0. This implies d != c. This is a contradiction, so our supposition is inaccurate. d = a - b + c<p>Now, suppose a + c != b + d. Plug in what we just learned. a + c != b + a - b + c. The b's cancel, leaving another contradiction. Thus, supposition inaccurate, so a + c = b + d. QED
sleepdevover 14 years ago
Tangentially related question: how are real numbers formally defined?<p>I remember that integers are usually defined in terms of successors: Succ 1 = 2. But this doesn't help for real numbers because they can't really be enumerated?
评论 #1793987 未加载
mfukarover 14 years ago
a = a (equality is reflexive under Peano arithmetic)<p>=&#62; a + c = a + c (addition is commutative under Peano arithmetic)<p>=&#62; a + c = b + c (a == b)<p>=&#62; a + c = b + d (c == d)<p>qed
KoZeNover 14 years ago
<i>if a=b,c=d then a+c=b+d</i><p>Also, d= a-b+c<p>Probably doesn't help but thats about the limit of my capabilities!
评论 #1793971 未加载
TomK32over 14 years ago
a = b c = d<p>a + c = b + d a + c = a + c # replaced b with a and d with c
评论 #1794011 未加载
vladohover 14 years ago
Ohhhhh NOOO... my brain evaporated because of the stupidity of this thread...
评论 #1796047 未加载