TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

EC2 Instances with 6, 9, and 12 TB of Memory

74 pointsby jeffbarrover 6 years ago

11 comments

packetslaveover 6 years ago
Also gives you 224 physical CPU cores (448 logical cores).<p>Requires a 3-year reservation, and &quot;the effective hourly rate for the All Upfront 3-Year Reservation for a u-12tb1.metal Dedicated Host in the US East (N. Virginia) Region is $30.539 per hour.&quot;<p>Works out to $267,512.88 per year, or $802,538.64 for the 3-year term. I wonder how that compares to building your own on-premise host with that much RAM (obviously, there&#x27;s operational costs to consider as well).<p>Also, don&#x27;t miss the last line: &quot;We’re not stopping at 12 TiB, and are planning to launch instances with 18 TiB and 24 TiB of memory in 2019.&quot;
评论 #18090058 未加载
评论 #18089267 未加载
评论 #18089420 未加载
评论 #18089596 未加载
评论 #18089273 未加载
alfalfasproutover 6 years ago
One of the neat things of instances w&#x2F; this scale of memory is that we can once again start avoiding the perils of distributed computation. Because you have immense data locality, a lot of computations can be parallelized much more efficiently if they involve large sequences of trivially parallelizable tasks that are short-lived.
manigandhamover 6 years ago
Is SAP HANA any good?<p>I don&#x27;t have any experience with it but it&#x27;s the one single example that&#x27;s always used in every vendor post about high-memory machines.
jcwayneover 6 years ago
Interesting that you can&#x27;t simply spin one up on your own; you have to contact AWS to get the process started. Maybe it&#x27;s simply because of the amount of money you&#x27;re committing to spend, but I find the possibility that they&#x27;re now offering an instance type that requires them to physically provision it for you intriguing.
评论 #18089857 未加载
评论 #18089665 未加载
kuwzeover 6 years ago
I wish “your data fits in memory”[0] was still up.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9581862" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9581862</a>
评论 #18090110 未加载
评论 #18089893 未加载
israrkhanover 6 years ago
I would like to see if you can build such a monster yourself, and how much would it cost? Did Amazon designed their own motherboards or used some off the shelf boards?
评论 #18089417 未加载
评论 #18089445 未加载
joaomacpover 6 years ago
I think in this case we should praise Amazon: this should really help for certain use cases (running Minecraft at a decent frame-rate comes to mind).
throwaway5250over 6 years ago
640GB ought to be enough for anybody.
swingline-747over 6 years ago
<i>Retail</i> price of the server components (no racks, PDUs, busbars, fibre drop, network switch, KVM, circuit-breaker, rack&amp;stack, rack anti-tip bracing, artistic cabling, tech support):<p>CPU 8176M: $11,805.00 USD x 8 = $94,440.00<p>RAM 64GB: $866.23 x 192 = $166,316.16<p>Chassis + 2x 10 GbE NICs + SSD boot device: ~$8000<p>Total: ~$269k USD<p>AWS price: $803k<p>Under 150% gross profit margin (without electricity, fibre or real-state) over 3 years. I&#x27;d say the closer figure is ~ $300-400k per box for single company-scale servers, leading to a closer-to-net profit Amazon profit of around 100%<p>Although, it&#x27;s possible to keep a server beyond its lifecycle and run it into the ground once it&#x27;s already paid-for, as opposed to getting nothing at the end of the Amazon lease.<p>There&#x27;s trade-offs for both cases; some people would rather pay more to not have to deal with quotes, vendors or shipping issues.
评论 #18090175 未加载
eipover 6 years ago
This is bad for $MU.
Bishonen88over 6 years ago
but will it run GTA5?
评论 #18089364 未加载