They could have found a way to keep "print" as both a function and a statement. <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6239887/what-is-the-advantage-of-the-new-print-function-in-python-3-x-over-the-python-2" rel="nofollow">https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6239887/what-is-the-adva...</a>
A better version can be found here (looks better on mobile and Safari)
<a href="https://countdownto.xyz/c/jnfztcj0" rel="nofollow">https://countdownto.xyz/c/jnfztcj0</a>
I’ve always loved this concept. I made this back in the day, kind of relevant. <a href="https://www.launchclock.co" rel="nofollow">https://www.launchclock.co</a>
Umm - no.<p>There is a lot of python 2 code still out there - including with some big players.<p>Critical security issues if any will still likely see patches.<p>Anyone from a big python 2 org able to comment? Is everyone migrating all code?
There's been <a href="https://pythonclock.org/" rel="nofollow">https://pythonclock.org/</a> for a long time.<p>See also <a href="http://python3statement.org/" rel="nofollow">http://python3statement.org/</a>.
Haha ten years from now Python2 will be alive and well. The only way most Python2 orgs will stop using it is when they shut down.<p>What this really means is 437 days until a dedicated Python2 org takes over maintenance.