TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Why do large companies work with IT work-force providers?

1 pointsby evoneutronover 6 years ago
So I was contacted by a recruiter from an IT service provider firm about potential SWE position for a large public company (client). The terms of that employment would be - W2 with the recruiting company that then &#x27;contracts&#x27; me out to the client.<p>I get the part where the recruiting company is interested in such relationship because they will get the delta between the $ client pays them and $ they pay me, but what is the benefit for the client? I never really understood that.<p>In this case the hourly rate would be ~$80&#x2F;hr which is similar to what a client would pay their employees for a Sr SWE position.<p>So if I get paid $80&#x2F;hr per contract that means the client has to pay more to the recruiting firm for them to justify employing me.<p>So the client may end up paying more for a contractor than a full-time employee?<p>Or is there a catch that Im missing? I&#x27;ve also never been employed like that, so would like to know what are the pros&#x2F;cons of such employment terms?

2 comments

lucozadeover 6 years ago
It depends to some extent on the arrangement but some benefits include:<p>+ rapid on boarding - if the service provider has a bench then it can be much quicker than hiring a significant number of people<p>+ flexibility - the client can ramp up and down relatively quickly without the hiring&#x2F;firing overhead<p>+ legal - there is a fair amount of red tape associated with a full time employee that is expensive. A lot of jurisdictions have similar rules with direct contractors.<p>And others along similar lines. Effectively what the service provider is doing is moving some dev staff from a fixed cost to a variable cost. So from the client&#x27;s pov it&#x27;s not just the direct cost for the work you&#x27;re doing that&#x27;s important, it&#x27;s also the cost that they won&#x27;t incur by not employing directly.<p>And that flexibilty&#x2F;responsiveness can be very, very valuable. If you can cut my ramp up time by 3-6 months, in my line of work, that can easily translate to millions. I&#x27;m willing to pay for that.<p>Source, run multiple programmes that use a mix of FTEs, contractors and service providers.
bediger4000over 6 years ago
I always suspected that &quot;contractors&quot; are a way of skirting labor laws about trial periods. Real, ethical reasons for contract employees may exist (you only need a very specialized skill for a small time), but there&#x27;s far too many contract employees in less specialized roles for this to be the real reason.