The live demo is a really neat detail, but it can be overwhelming for an uninitiated user.<p>I first didn't even notice it was a live demo until my mouse was over it and I wanted to scroll down and instead the graph in the demo zoomed out.<p>Some feedback:<p>- Just today on HN: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18410628" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18410628</a><p>- I would not do a live demo but instead illustrate using pictures and perhaps a little intro video.<p>- It's not made clear enough what the core differentiators of the product are vs. existing process tools, such as Trello or Asana. In fact I currently don't see the benefits of a graph-based approach over other tools. Doesn't mean that there aren't any, just that they aren't made clear.<p>- In the live demo: the box being displayed when I hover over a tree node is almost always (partly) off screen.
The "need more pixels" message is quite frustrating. I get that it might be not practical to support small resolutions, but I was unable to see the demo even on "desktop mode" in landscape on a really big phone. How many pixels do you need? If it's still not practical to support that, a demo video player would be a great fallback.
Great concept. It seems like the graph view is begging to convey more information. At the very least it seems appropriate for the nodes to have an icon based on what kind of data they contain, for instance, a paperclip or document for an attached paper, a histogram for univariate data, a regression plot for bivariate, etc.
For some reason I have added intercom.io on my NoScript in the past. I DuckDuckGo-ed it and it returns: "Intercom is a priceless tool that helps us drive Sales and Support through every step of the funnel."<p>I now will add sentry.io in my AdBlock+ list.<p>I am getting a login in screen with nothing else. I value my privacy over your service. But I sincerely wish you the best on your endeavors.
Just random nitpicks:
The "interact with me" emoji is hard to make out, looks like a glitch at first. Emojis should be images, for both consistency and making sure people don't get boxy question marks if their browser can't render. "toggle fullscreen" is off-center vertically. The demo frame is messed up in Edge. The text in the about page needs a max width.
Like others mentioned the demo is a bit overwhelming, it also has some minor UX issues and is generally the weakest link design wise at the moment.
Supposedly this is for any device, but it doesn't work well on my cell phone. The interactive demo says "not enough pixels" and the chat widget gets in the way.<p>For smaller screens, I think it's better not to try to put as much stuff on the front page? A button going to another screen might work better than a widget.
Apologize, but I'm super confused about this product. How is this compared to say codalab (<a href="https://worksheets.codalab.org/" rel="nofollow">https://worksheets.codalab.org/</a>) for organizing experiments?