The craziest part to me was that they wanted to discredit their protestors via both:
1. anti-Semitism (claiming the protestors were working for Soros)
2. anti-anti-Semitism (claiming the protesters hated Jews)<p>I feel like there's an incredulity limit to what a company can do before the general populace starts revolting against them, and attempting to combine these two tactics may severely strain it, if not blow past it altogether.
Couldn't Soros sue for libel? I had the same question when high-level Republicans kept saying that the anti-Kavanaugh protestors where all paid by Soros.
Does this surprise anyone who understands the level of psychological manipulation they deploy to create quick dopamine hits that create addicts out of users?
This might get downvoted for being political, but I find it completely fascinating that 2 polar opposites, both Trump and Zuckerberg, seem to be employing the exact same tactics. They both are very divisive when there is controversy and both link people they are battling against to Soros.