TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The Google Cemetery – A list of dead Google products and why they died

680 pointsby naeemnurover 6 years ago

107 comments

jansanover 6 years ago
Remember Google Code Search? That was a great feature of Google search. You could search for swear words in all the code available worldwide. In one (Sun Microsystems?) code there was a comment "The user is a wanker. He cannot remember his password." The old days were much more fun.
评论 #18510643 未加载
评论 #18510198 未加载
评论 #18510648 未加载
评论 #18510310 未加载
评论 #18515599 未加载
评论 #18511191 未加载
评论 #18513735 未加载
评论 #18513826 未加载
评论 #18511431 未加载
评论 #18514424 未加载
评论 #18511158 未加载
评论 #18515838 未加载
评论 #18511307 未加载
the_dukeover 6 years ago
I know we bash Google for discontinuing services here a lot.<p>I definitely bemoaned the demise of Google Reader.<p>But if this list is complete, it&#x27;s really not so bad, considering the size and age of Google.
评论 #18510008 未加载
评论 #18510231 未加载
评论 #18509870 未加载
评论 #18509884 未加载
评论 #18515222 未加载
评论 #18511006 未加载
评论 #18512155 未加载
评论 #18511478 未加载
评论 #18511293 未加载
评论 #18509993 未加载
评论 #18514671 未加载
评论 #18514110 未加载
评论 #18513635 未加载
评论 #18512585 未加载
评论 #18511565 未加载
评论 #18510176 未加载
chiefalchemistover 6 years ago
re: Google Wave<p>&quot;why dead? - Google Wave was discontinued because there just weren’t enough active users. The IP was later transferred to Apache when the development was discontinued.&quot;<p>Kinda. But more accurately, there weren&#x27;t enough active users because Google __completely__ botched the beta. In restricting the invites then prevented already establish groups for trying it. For example, if you have a group of 4 or 5 and not as many invites, it was no go.<p>Keep in mind, Wave was pre-Slack. The market was there. It was primed. It was waiting for something smart and collaborative. Yet Google did the one thing you don&#x27;t want to do with a team-centric tool...intentionally leave out at least one team member.
评论 #18511315 未加载
评论 #18511078 未加载
评论 #18510332 未加载
评论 #18511564 未加载
评论 #18512374 未加载
评论 #18510887 未加载
评论 #18513060 未加载
评论 #18510808 未加载
评论 #18511321 未加载
评论 #18512355 未加载
评论 #18511255 未加载
评论 #18511088 未加载
m12kover 6 years ago
Neat! Maybe you could add a line or two to describe what each product was? For example I&#x27;d never heard about Sidewiki, Google Jaiku or Google Catalogs. It seems fitting that a tombstone would mention not just the date of death but also a bit about who they were and what they did.
评论 #18511506 未加载
评论 #18510001 未加载
评论 #18513652 未加载
评论 #18510864 未加载
princetmanover 6 years ago
Even after 5+ years, I still miss Google Reader almost everyday. Just pure simplicity and tight community around sharing is yet to be matched IMO. Web has moved on and as someone commented here, it’s walled garden everywhere now.<p>Thank you Google of yore for creating and running a great service for as long as you did!
评论 #18510741 未加载
评论 #18510151 未加载
评论 #18515614 未加载
评论 #18514235 未加载
评论 #18517630 未加载
russfinkover 6 years ago
What about Google Sets? It was on their Labs page until about 2010. Sets let you type in some words, and then it would return additional words that fit with the previous words. Now there is a Google Sheets feature that does it, but I liked the idea of a stand alone page.
评论 #18514554 未加载
asaphover 6 years ago
&gt; In October 2018, Google announced that it was shutting down Google+ for consumers, citing low user engagement and a software error.<p>I wouldn&#x27;t characterize it as a &quot;software error&quot;. It was a security vulnerability.[0]<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.blog.google&#x2F;technology&#x2F;safety-security&#x2F;project-strobe&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.blog.google&#x2F;technology&#x2F;safety-security&#x2F;project-s...</a>
评论 #18513609 未加载
评论 #18511137 未加载
h4l0over 6 years ago
Google Spaces lived for so short, it is not included in the list and so far nobody has mentioned it in the comments. It was a product that me and my friends have long thought of. I think if it were implemented in a way that focused on chat but not on shared links, it could have been a success. I still believe that niche future will find its way into a popular chat application.
评论 #18511571 未加载
codyogdenover 6 years ago
Oo..cool! I crowdsourced a lot of lesser known products over at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;killedbygoogle.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;killedbygoogle.com</a>. I&#x27;ll be pruning the list this weekend to combine&#x2F;remove some of the phone&#x2F;device additions that were added by others during Hacktoberfest.
Animatsover 6 years ago
Looking at this list, it makes you realize that basing your business on a lesser Google product is a major business risk. Consider Spatial OS.[1] This is a new back end for persistent massively multiplayer games. It&#x27;s a product from a Google &quot;partner&quot;, funded by $500M of VC money. It&#x27;s only available if you use Google&#x27;s &quot;cloud&quot;. Technically, it&#x27;s impressive. It&#x27;s being used for a few minor game titles right now.<p>So if you&#x27;re a major game developer, should you use this for a long-running game? The Google connection adds business risk. It probably won&#x27;t be a major moneymaker for Google, and there&#x27;s a good chance they&#x27;ll drop the offering in two or three years. Then what? It comes with Google-type terms and conditions, the usual &quot;Google can do anything they want&quot;. Drop the product, raise the price, cut off your service because you&#x27;re doing something that competes with some Google interest, that kind of thing.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;improbable.io&#x2F;games" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;improbable.io&#x2F;games</a>
评论 #18514212 未加载
max_sendfeldover 6 years ago
How about Google Glass? In all fairness though, quite a few are only dead as standalone products but have merged into other offerings. Take Google Gears for example - offline storage, worker threads and other APIs for browsers, all of which is now part of regular Chrome.
评论 #18510110 未加载
NelsonMinarover 6 years ago
Aw I&#x27;m sad to not see my first Google product on the list: the old SOAP search API. 2002-2006 RIP. I wrote a bit about it when they shut it down: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.somebits.com&#x2F;weblog&#x2F;tech&#x2F;googleSearchAPI.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.somebits.com&#x2F;weblog&#x2F;tech&#x2F;googleSearchAPI.html</a>
asaphover 6 years ago
Though not a <i>product</i> per-se, Google Instant Search was a significant enough feature that I think it merits inclusion in the list.<p>Previous HN discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14857120" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=14857120</a>
jordighover 6 years ago
I hope the Data Liberation Front, while not exactly a &quot;product&quot;, lives a long and prosper life for as long as Google hoards our data:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Google_Data_Liberation_Front" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Google_Data_Liberation_Front</a><p>They were quite helpful in getting about a decade worth of gmail data out of there when I decided I didn&#x27;t want to use gmail anymore.
评论 #18512440 未加载
nashashmiover 6 years ago
Really amazing how many products were merged into Google+ and superceded. And then also how many products were sunsetted in favor of putting more development time into Google+.<p>And then Google+ was sunsetted and machine learning and other built in features are doing a better job of prospering than any other Google properties.<p>Google was always a nerd company. Creating social platforms was always an SMH move.
CodeBytesover 6 years ago
Neat idea. What&#x27;s the criteria? Just it seems to be missing Google Code. Had a look on Wikipedia and seems to be a lot missing from that too: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_Google_products#Discontinued_products_and_services" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_Google_products#Discon...</a>
IvyMikeover 6 years ago
I feel like there should be an honorable mention for Google Groups&#x2F;Dejanews. I mean, I guess usenet search is still there, but it&#x27;s a shadow of its former usefulness.
评论 #18510934 未加载
myfonjover 6 years ago
What about leaving flowers, like the one on the slate.com from 2013 [0][1] used to facilitate?<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gizmodo.com.au&#x2F;2013&#x2F;03&#x2F;google-graveyard-does-exist-you-can-even-place-flowers-on-your-deceased-favourites&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gizmodo.com.au&#x2F;2013&#x2F;03&#x2F;google-graveyard-does-exi...</a> [1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.slate.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;technology&#x2F;map_of_the_week&#x2F;2013&#x2F;03&#x2F;google_reader_joins_graveyard_of_dead_google_products.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.slate.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;technology&#x2F;map_of_the_week&#x2F;201...</a>
amachefeover 6 years ago
I am still flamoxed by the decision to discontinue GTalk... The build Hangout and later Allo&#x2F;Duo<p>Talk was lightweight, history backups and usable in every platform.<p>Any startups would love to have Talk
评论 #18512195 未加载
michaluover 6 years ago
It&#x27;s missing some services like Google Offers a Groupon competitor: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Google_Offers" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Google_Offers</a><p>and Google Reader ... from the top of my head, and some enterprise products if I am not mistaken
bambaxover 6 years ago
GSA is missing: Google Search Appliance. It was a server you could host on the company&#x27;s premises that would index content on your network. It got discontinued, not sure why.<p>Maybe the list only includes B2C products.
评论 #18513672 未加载
Doctor_Feggover 6 years ago
Google Map Maker: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Google_Map_Maker" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Google_Map_Maker</a>
betandrover 6 years ago
Mentioned a couple of times but it&#x27;s still raw that Inbox has been canned too. Also the Googlers I know use it and Gmail is some ways back although it has been improved. It&#x27;s been the best thing to happen to email forever, IMO, and I&#x27;ll really miss it!
评论 #18511252 未加载
ernsheongover 6 years ago
For companies that continue to innovate, product failures and deprecations are only to be expected. It&#x27;s not unlike startups that fail for all sorts of reasons?<p>I&#x27;d be more worried if Google tried to do everything. We&#x27;re human and finite, after all.
nolokover 6 years ago
I miss surprisingly few of those, notebook and picasa basically. Could have missed Reader but it was replaced by the theoldreader almost overnight thanks to advices here (I wasn&#x27;t a community user but a solo one so I did not miss the features that may not have been replicated).<p>I think the bigger issue is the features google removed or modified from some of its products; like my biggest miss is true verbatim search.
评论 #18510675 未加载
评论 #18510957 未加载
chrissnellover 6 years ago
Let&#x27;s not forget <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;google.com&#x2F;bsd" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;google.com&#x2F;bsd</a> and <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;google.com&#x2F;linux" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;google.com&#x2F;linux</a><p>Search engines for BSD and Linux topics in the earliest days of Google. These were very popular with the Slashdot crowd, which was probably responsible for the initial succsss of Google.
评论 #18515365 未加载
vram22over 6 years ago
Crazy idea: instead of shutting them down, they should have sold them off to companies who could run and grow them. Maybe not for $Bs but for $Ms.
评论 #18511834 未加载
评论 #18515204 未加载
xyphoidover 6 years ago
Google bought Bitium slightly more than a year ago. Exactly a year after the acquisition they notified they were discontinuing service for us - it sounds like it was a straight acquihire and shutdown for their identity platform.<p>Migrating our whole corp password management to a new platform right during the busy time of year has been a nightmare.
darren_over 6 years ago
A somethingawful YOSPOS person had a similar idea years ago and made <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;didgoogleshutdown.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;didgoogleshutdown.com&#x2F;</a><p>(unfortunately it hasn&#x27;t updated in a while and said SA poster may not have had the best insight into google product lifetimes)
crussoover 6 years ago
Google Wave is the one that stands out on that list for me. It was such a fantastic and ambitious idea, but the execution was so buggy that it was basically unusable.
评论 #18510235 未加载
评论 #18510461 未加载
评论 #18510228 未加载
karp773over 6 years ago
There area still many more Google products which are effectively buried alive down the level and levels of menus.<p>I find it puzzling and ironic how difficult it is to find a Google product. They should have a Google product search somewhere in the apps menu in the browser.<p>Also, next to zero marketing.
bradleyjgover 6 years ago
GWT is, if not dead, at least in a deliberately induced coma. And unlike some of the other items it wasn’t a consumer product, it was a heavily evangelized framework that companies and developers invested in and then were left high and dry.
评论 #18510668 未加载
评论 #18510586 未加载
owaisloneover 6 years ago
Can&#x27;t help but think how many services were stopped in order to build those features in G+ which eventually failed as well. At least we got Google Photos out of it which seems to be a great app. Hope it lives long enough.
AndrewKemendoover 6 years ago
Tango should definitely be on this list.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Tango_(platform)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Tango_(platform)</a>
评论 #18510009 未加载
评论 #18510219 未加载
squarefootover 6 years ago
To me embracing and extinguishing the wonderful Dejanews, then when everyone is accustomed to use Google to search for Usenet posts, removing the discussion search filter from Google search engine counts just like a milestone in the planned destruction of Usenet. That move to me looks a lot worse than axing G+ and other services I don&#x27;t miss at all, because Usenet has been here long before Google and is not one of their products.
goodmachineover 6 years ago
Nice. These tombstones need a &quot;more&quot; button where links, discussion, lessons learned and a proper obituary can be found. Worth noting that the brand (and ethical vision) have also died and been reborn.<p>Last thing: it would also be interesting to see if the death rate is increasing or declining over time: a higher death rate indicates a healthy org still experimenting.
评论 #18510597 未加载
评论 #18511698 未加载
austincheneyover 6 years ago
Google Wave died because it was a nice hipster idea that never came close to meeting the basic requirements for a corporate office, which was its primary audience. While Google completely failed to realize why this was an obvious and immediate failure Atlassian didn&#x27;t miss a beat and took all of that marketshare.
Etheryteover 6 years ago
Missing from the list are the many, many competing products &amp; services Google bought and then promptly shut down.
评论 #18511625 未加载
erikigover 6 years ago
The Google Products Wikipedia page is also a great resource for this as well as a history of the missions, founders, acquisitions etc.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_Google_products" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_Google_products</a>
sytelusover 6 years ago
I wonder why sustainance engineering is so hard. We have managed to bring down devops almost exponentially in terms of headcount per server. We have also managed to bring down the cost of storage, hosting etc. The only thing I would have to worry about is patching code for constant stream of security vulnerabilities and upgrading to new framework&#x2F;platforms after LTS expires. Is this the only driving factor for these shutdowns (generally speaking for all companies)? This could be a good business opportunity for a startup that comes around and can say “ok, we will take care of your app, keep upgrading and patching as needed for a small fee.”. More importantly we need better development methodology that has infinite sustainance as native as everything test cases.
joering2over 6 years ago
You should not be worry registering googlecementery.com. You not defaming company you merely stating facts. You would be protected under 1A. and you most likely be indexed by google and bing. So if someone is searching for “google dead projects” it would be easier to find. Just my 2c.
评论 #18525879 未加载
donatjover 6 years ago
Oh man, I forgot about Google 411. I loved that and used it all the time before I had a smartphone.
brownbatover 6 years ago
Some of these I don&#x27;t remember, and a couple I actually thought I was still using. :)<p>The Dodgeball saga seems like a good case study: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2010&#x2F;08&#x2F;05&#x2F;eric-schmidt-google-dodgeball-foursquare&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2010&#x2F;08&#x2F;05&#x2F;eric-schmidt-google-dodgeb...</a><p>It&#x27;s as if Google is simply too big to realize what a good idea is and support it.<p>Ads made Google one of the most profitable companies in the world basically overnight. No one&#x27;s passion project will ever look good against that measuring stick.
s9wover 6 years ago
What about Google Goggles?
评论 #18509992 未加载
评论 #18511241 未加载
评论 #18510025 未加载
gowthamgts12over 6 years ago
Google Talk is my all time favourite. The UI is cleaner and it just worked everytime.<p>Picasso is also a good photo viewer when I was using Windows. It&#x27;s a shame really.
posiover 6 years ago
The upcoming destruction of inbox will be enough to get me off of gmail. I keep on having google PR people tell me that GMail has all those features. I try gmail everymonth and everymonth I&#x27;m back on inbox in less than a day. I created <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;t.co&#x2F;gyeQCX7lnU" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;t.co&#x2F;gyeQCX7lnU</a> but it seems no one else really cares about the stuff Id o.
评论 #18511297 未加载
jimmaswellover 6 years ago
It&#x27;s unfortunate they made the free edition of sketchup only a web app from now on. At least you can still get older desktop versions.
评论 #18510774 未加载
TheRealPomaxover 6 years ago
It would be nice if this were orderable by &quot;what year it was released&quot;&#x2F;&quot;what year it was shuttered&quot;, naeemnur. Would also be good to link to the official &quot;shut down&quot; notice, which presumably you had to consult to get the date right, so having a link that people can follow to start their own web trawl would be quite useful.
gsichover 6 years ago
I still use Picasa to tag photos with face recognition. Haven&#x27;t found anything even remotely better. I hoped for some advancements with the current ML hype.<p>For hints I would be thankful. Requirements: Must work offline, must store face information in the picture (XMP). Must work with ~1 TB of pictures. Digikam unfortunately sucks. Bad face recognotion and bad UI.
SergeyDruidover 6 years ago
The list is missing Froogle
felipelemosover 6 years ago
About Google Reader:. &quot;Google announced they were discontinuing Google Reader, stating the product had a loyal but declining following, and they wanted to focus on fewer products&quot;.<p>I cannot believe it&#x27;s true. My understanding is with a news aggregator like it Google cannot control the news feed like it does with Google news.
评论 #18511840 未加载
andreiursanover 6 years ago
I would also add to the list radio ads <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2009&#x2F;02&#x2F;13&#x2F;technology&#x2F;companies&#x2F;13google.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2009&#x2F;02&#x2F;13&#x2F;technology&#x2F;companies&#x2F;13go...</a>
steveharmanover 6 years ago
And now in act of insanity they plan to shutter Inbox . :-(<p>Please sign this guy&#x27;s petition if you don&#x27;t want it to happen.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.change.org&#x2F;p&#x2F;google-google-don-t-kill-inbox" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.change.org&#x2F;p&#x2F;google-google-don-t-kill-inbox</a>
sytelusover 6 years ago
Is url shortner dead for real? That would be disaster! So many links on web will turn dead. When I use URL shortner, there is an implicit trust that thing will exist for very very long time. It’s cheap to run, it’s useful for analytics. Why this should ever be killed?
评论 #18514071 未加载
creebleover 6 years ago
Goo.gl was deprecated in March.<p>Not that the world was wanting for yet another url-shortener.
ledrivebyover 6 years ago
The cement tiles around Building 17 at Microsoft are actually like a physical graveyard. So many dead products! The 90&#x27;s CD-ROM multimedia era generated a lot of dead-end franchises.
qwerty456127over 6 years ago
Aardvark was the coolest Q&amp;A system ever, it&#x27;s loss is a real tragedy, it&#x27;s infuriating how Google bought it just to close it. Also Google+ was the best social network ever.
maaaatsover 6 years ago
Would be cool if it also explained what some of these services were.
thrifterover 6 years ago
I don&#x27;t see Songza on the list: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Songza" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Songza</a><p>I miss that service.
评论 #18511667 未加载
charkubiover 6 years ago
Ironic there&#x27;s an option to share the article on Google Plus.
评论 #18510571 未加载
texmex20over 6 years ago
I&#x27;d like to hear what the &quot;lessons learned&quot; were for each of these. And how did these dead products help shape future products that were perhaps more successful.
croisillonover 6 years ago
There are still links named &quot;Picasa&quot; on Google Maps...
ashelmireover 6 years ago
If this is your site; the reasons only come up when clicking the rather small images, though it looks like clicking anywhere in the “cards” should do this. (On mobile).
评论 #18509879 未加载
评论 #18509960 未加载
lisperover 6 years ago
Would be nice to have a brief description of what each of these dead projects actually was. I only vaguely remember Aardvark. I&#x27;ve never heard of Dodgeball.
Animatsover 6 years ago
Then there are zombies, like Google Voice and Google Fiber. They&#x27;re not dead, but they&#x27;re in maintenance mode, not being improved or extended.
评论 #18513067 未加载
评论 #18511743 未加载
majaniover 6 years ago
I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s fair to include products that were rebranded and had their data moved over to the new service e.g Picasa and Urchin
corvover 6 years ago
Still waiting on the day Google is going to discontinue Google.<p>Used to love the company and what the people there stood for. Crazy how things have changed.
capkutayover 6 years ago
I really loved Google Wave back in 2009&#x2F;10. Used it to collab on a college project and we thought it was buggy but pretty useful.
petilonover 6 years ago
I would like to see a similar list for Apple. I think Apple&#x27;s list would be shorter, because Apple releases fewer products.
评论 #18511080 未加载
评论 #18510771 未加载
评论 #18511592 未加载
crazygringoover 6 years ago
Google+ is listed as the first item... but it&#x27;s still around...<p>It was only discontinued for consumers. It&#x27;s still part of paid G Suite, it just focuses on sharing posts and topics <i>within</i> a company now -- something it&#x27;s actually pretty good at. [1]<p>I wouldn&#x27;t call it a &quot;dead Google product&quot; by any means.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gsuite.google.com&#x2F;products&#x2F;googleplus&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gsuite.google.com&#x2F;products&#x2F;googleplus&#x2F;</a>
评论 #18510398 未加载
tooltalkover 6 years ago
Was Diane Greene&#x27;s Bebop which Google acquired for $380M in 2016, ever productized? or is it still work-in-progress?
评论 #18510416 未加载
your-nannyover 6 years ago
i wish this site gave a brief summary of each product in addition to info on its demise. don&#x27;t know many of them
catchmeifyoucanover 6 years ago
I liked iGoogle. I thought it was kind of cool. It would&#x27;ve been a great &quot;new tab&quot; page in Chrome tbh
miguelmotaover 6 years ago
Would also like to see a list of Google services currently on life support; not yet dead, but struggling to survive
moreiraover 6 years ago
Has it seriously been half a decade since Google Reader died? That’s one of those “wow time flies” moments for me.
mikejbover 6 years ago
Slightly (un)related, at Google X they seem to have an interesting way to select what projects they pursue and which not: Whenever they get an idea about a project, they try to kill the idea as fast as possible. Astro Teller talked about this in an interview with Adam Savage: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;UErbxoBhWoM?t=414" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;UErbxoBhWoM?t=414</a>
Jyaifover 6 years ago
What annoys me the most is that they have the right ideas (Waves, Helpouts), but they lack conviction. The most ridicoulous example is when they introduced wireless charging, then removed it, and then added it back when Apple finally added it themselves.<p>They also sometimes lack imaginations, namely cancelling Reader instead of morphing it into some sort of G+. That plus AMP would have given FB a run for their money.
评论 #18510274 未加载
allardover 6 years ago
Don&#x27;t know if it&#x27;s dead now. It wasn&#x27;t when Google sold it nine years ago — Radio Automation.
beefmanover 6 years ago
Now we need one showing all the products killed as soon as the startups that made them were acquired.
Nightshaxxover 6 years ago
I love how many products got shutdown and moved into Google+, then google+ got shut down....
flatlineover 6 years ago
I still miss google desktop. The Windows search indexer has never been particularly good.
评论 #18513084 未加载
Foobar8568over 6 years ago
Didn&#x27;t Google at one point published or planned to create a CRM solution?
deytempoover 6 years ago
I might be just tired but I didn’t see google finance stock screener in there
mxschumacherover 6 years ago
an archive of all the dead code of failed commercial products would be interesting. Both to study the implementation itself, but also to see the version history. Lots to learn &#x2F; reuse I suppose!
mir3laover 6 years ago
It’s missing Google Inbox which I’m going to miss just as much as Reader
philonoistover 6 years ago
Does DuckDuckGo have the scope to revive some of these and get an edge?
JamesCoyneover 6 years ago
The site is not reachable for me. Here is a mirror.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20181122170006&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gcemetery.co" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20181122170006&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gcemetery...</a>
thearn4over 6 years ago
I&#x27;m worried that Google Voice will join this list sometime soon
评论 #18511689 未加载
howard941over 6 years ago
If the Cemetery contained zombies it might have housed the old Google News [*]<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theoldgnews.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;headlines?ned=us&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theoldgnews.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;headlines?ned=us&amp;hl=en</a>
hardwaresoftonover 6 years ago
Alternate (likely open) domain name: googlotha (pun on Golgotha).
评论 #18510331 未加载
becgaover 6 years ago
Cause of death would be nice instead of &#x27;why dead?&#x27;
ASiposover 6 years ago
Don&#x27;t forget Google X (the original one)!
thrower123over 6 years ago
Gmail is about due to be put on this list. They have made the web UI unusable for no good reason, and driven me back to an old-school desktop mail client.
评论 #18511434 未加载
评论 #18510657 未加载
dwighttkover 6 years ago
What percentage are messaging apps?
评论 #18512087 未加载
fargoover 6 years ago
How can we suggest new items?
adventuredover 6 years ago
You could safely add Freebase (by Metaweb) to the list of things Google killed.
mythrwyover 6 years ago
Google App inventor? (guess it&#x27;s still around, got transferred to MIT).
tkyjonathanover 6 years ago
I miss igoogle...
starboy1996over 6 years ago
Google Inbox?
评论 #18510281 未加载
danielovichdkover 6 years ago
Google is a search engine. That&#x27;s it.
dakicsover 6 years ago
+ Panoramio
pasbesoinover 6 years ago
Wave solved problems I encountered in commercial (large scale corporations) work.<p>It could prevent &quot;submarining&quot; of communication into email chains and instant messaging conversations inaccessible to those not addressed or cc-ed, also preventing the time-burning, frustrating, and often incomplete &quot;email dive&quot; someone would have to perform to find and forward all these emails to e.g. a new team member or another interested party (new manager, legal, possibly even a third party).<p>Add people to the project&#x2F;communications&#x27; access list(s), and they not only gained participation (without eveyone having to remember to add them to the list of addressees on new emails) but also access to the historical record.<p>It enabled team-level permissions for both on-boarding and off-boarding of new parties: New team members, etc -- like above. Note the off-boarding facility, in that; short of termination, if someone left a project, you (normal PM or dev lead or whatever roll) could take them off the access lists for the shared communications and you could all go your separate ways with a clean, definable and documented break.<p>And a bunch of stuff that&#x27;s long since left my immediately accessible, conscious memory.<p>(Alternatives I saw did not compare. E.g. &quot;project documentation skeletons&quot; expanded from Lotus Notes templates, that left ginormous subtrees of &quot;forms&quot; that were often very sparsely, if at all, completed -- said completion being entirely, manually dependent upon the individual doing the work. Finding any bit of information in those was a giant PIA; who knows into which form they entered it, if at all, and even when they did, it was surrounded by tons of boilerplate that made it disappear into that &quot;haystack&quot;.)<p>BUT...<p>They let front end development hang this very Javascript-heavy UI on it that bogged down &quot;normal&quot; machines, making the end-user experience rather miserable. That &quot;lag&quot; (to be generous in description), combined with a healthy dose of &quot;mystery meat&quot; UI.<p>People hated that. And they stayed away. (If you could even talk them into giving the beta a try... once they had access to the beta...)<p>Maybe it ran fine on internal &quot;Core++&quot; or whatever, ueber-motherboard and maxed RAM Google machines with local hops to the server. But no-one inside seemed to give it a good hard run in the &quot;real world&quot;. Or to worry about said performance problems, if they did.<p>Well, I never got invested in it, other than hope and poking at it a bit once someone gave me access. But I continued to think, for a good long while, that the end result was a shame.<p>P.S. This is just my personal, outsider perspective. Maybe I have some things wrong. But it&#x27;s the impression I ended up with.
mito88over 6 years ago
google+ still breathing.
starpilotover 6 years ago
I don&#x27;t miss any of these.
bananatronover 6 years ago
RIP Inbox
rustcharmover 6 years ago
Orkut’s story had a strange footnote. It was dominated by Brazilian Portuguese speakers, making other users feel less welcome. That was a tough problem.
ryanmarshover 6 years ago
This is why I use AWS.