TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Facebook Considered Charging for Access to User Data

117 pointsby thombleover 6 years ago

11 comments

neonateover 6 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;outline.com&#x2F;dgvaxt" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;outline.com&#x2F;dgvaxt</a>
nijaveover 6 years ago
How is this different than any other company in any other industry? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Information_broker" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Information_broker</a><p>This is credit agencies&#x27; entire business model and you can&#x27;t even opt out&#x2F;close your account
评论 #18558619 未加载
评论 #18558938 未加载
JeffreyKaineover 6 years ago
I&#x27;d actually be down with this, but only if facebook gave user&#x27;s the ability to lock their own data down at fair market price. That way the user pays for a product, or decides to be the product. It&#x27;s clean and cut &amp; dry; and there wouldn&#x27;t be any illusions of a &quot;free&quot; service.
评论 #18557627 未加载
icinnamonover 6 years ago
Isn&#x27;t their ad product already effectively charging for access to the user data? In a slightly more obfuscated way, sure, but broadly the same?
评论 #18557306 未加载
评论 #18558750 未加载
评论 #18557261 未加载
评论 #18557347 未加载
have_faithover 6 years ago
So what, we&#x27;ve all considered bad ideas.
评论 #18557187 未加载
jkaover 6 years ago
Even if customers pay for a service, isn&#x27;t it likely that eventually the service will <i>also</i> want to sell their data anyway in order to increase margins?
评论 #18557795 未加载
AznHisokaover 6 years ago
They already did this experiment years ago. They had a product called Pylon with Datasift. Rumor had it people thought it was a cool idea, in theory, but few people had any practical uses for it.
jonbronsonover 6 years ago
The real question is, did they decide not to because they realized it was unethical? Or because they felt it was too risky to public perception?
评论 #18557394 未加载
评论 #18557271 未加载
评论 #18557278 未加载
kgcover 6 years ago
Profit sharing would be interesting.
chris_wotover 6 years ago
When the product is free, it isn&#x27;t the product. You are the product.
nov29manover 6 years ago
Like Google employee Facebook employee would have done something, if they were any good.<p>Sorry for being harsh.<p>Reference: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;11&#x2F;27&#x2F;read-google-employees-open-letter-protesting-project-dragonfly.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2018&#x2F;11&#x2F;27&#x2F;read-google-employees-open-l...</a><p>Hanging more good quotes in the facebook&#x27;s office wall doesn&#x27;t make you any good, you are part of an organisation that creating more problems in the world, you are the reason. Unless you act and do your part.