Link to the findings themselves: <a href="https://decoders.amnesty.org/projects/troll-patrol/findings" rel="nofollow">https://decoders.amnesty.org/projects/troll-patrol/findings</a>
> The study looked at 778 women journalists and politicians in the US and UK, and found that 7.1 percent of tweets sent to them last year were abusive or problematic.<p>What is the baseline for "abusive or problematic" tweets? What's the amount of abuse a man can expect? Looking at their methodology, I don't think this was taken in to account (it looked just at a cross-section of female Twitter users).
Males receive more Twitter "abuse" than females: <a href="https://demos.co.uk/press-release/demos-male-celebrities-receive-more-abuse-on-twitter-than-women-2/" rel="nofollow">https://demos.co.uk/press-release/demos-male-celebrities-rec...</a>
So the online world mirrors the actual world: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDoVckC6NhA" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDoVckC6NhA</a><p>In short, men are animals and e-animals.