Meanwhile the healthrisks are being overlooked:<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUa_XbgZgq8" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUa_XbgZgq8</a><p><a href="https://www.projectcensored.org/4-how-big-wireless-convinced-us-cell-phones-and-wi-fi-are-safe/" rel="nofollow">https://www.projectcensored.org/4-how-big-wireless-convinced...</a><p><a href="https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/2/15/17008482/cellphones-cancer-miscarriage-health" rel="nofollow">https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/2/15/17008482/ce...</a>
Curious if anyone in the ATT orbit cares to weigh in on what the employees think about this.<p>Example: ATT got iPhone exclusivity, an iPhone launch was treated like a sort of 'dangerous Christmas' that was high risk if things went wrong (stock problems) but high rewards if things went right (iPhone was exclusive to ATT).
As expected, even if speeds are high, the data is still incredibly expensive. $70 for 15GB... why care about super fast speeds if you can barely use them.