TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

DragonFly BSD 5.4

114 pointsby stargraveover 6 years ago

9 comments

xteover 6 years ago
My biggest interest in DragonFlyBSD is hammer storage, while I of course appreciate the general hard work hw support and general usage does not suite most of my needs, especially when I start using NixOS&#x2F;GuixSD with the wonderful idea of having declarative&#x2F;functional systems that&#x27;s the future of ANY OS IMVHO but hammer by itself is fantastic.<p>It deserve a future not different than SSH.<p>On GNU&#x2F;Linux I &quot;mimic&quot; it with a classic poor man&#x27;s solution (mdraid+LUKS+LVM+nilfs2), in the past I&#x27;ve used zfs first on OpenSolaris (SXDE&#x2F;CE&#x2F;Indiana) and after even on GNU&#x2F;Linux but while remain a fantastic pioneer hammer being a logged fs is far superior.<p>Thanks so for the hard work!
评论 #18753858 未加载
评论 #18753735 未加载
tiffanyhover 6 years ago
I’m a big fan of DragonflyBSD and for all who don’t know DragonflyBSD well, here’s my summary of the OS when v5.0 was released [1]<p>It really doesn’t get the recognition it desires. It’s has highly advanced features and performance and frankly more people should be using it.<p>Given the recent ZFS&#x2F;FreeBSD news - I’d love more people to adopt DragonflyBSD for its Hammer2 filesysten.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15484735" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15484735</a>
评论 #18753189 未加载
gigatexalover 6 years ago
Are there benchmarks that show Hammer2 faster than a decently configured ZFS setup? What’s it offer that ZFS and snapshots and the like doesn’t? I’m not trying to start a flame war just curious
评论 #18755557 未加载
karmakazeover 6 years ago
Just myself trying to fit the various *BSD&#x27;s in my mind, I found this[0] which might be helpful:<p><pre><code> [...] each one has a specific purpose. OpenBSD security, FreeBSD more desktop&#x2F;server, NetBSD “run on anything and everything”, DragonFlyBSD scaling and performance. </code></pre> [0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;itsfoss.com&#x2F;why-use-bsd&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;itsfoss.com&#x2F;why-use-bsd&#x2F;</a>
评论 #18754207 未加载
评论 #18754358 未加载
评论 #18753554 未加载
awiesenhoferover 6 years ago
Does anyone here use DragonFly BSD in production? Would love to hear what people are using it for!
评论 #18754657 未加载
azinman2over 6 years ago
Who uses dragonfly bsd in any kind of non-experimental setup?
zandlover 6 years ago
Every time I read about DragonFly I’m never quite sure what it can do that’s different than other OSes that makes it interesting. The best I can tell it’s just that some of the subsystems are different and it’s more of an experiment for under the hood OS features.
评论 #18753466 未加载
评论 #18753066 未加载
reconbotover 6 years ago
I had no idea what dragonofly is, it looks to be an experimental BSD based OS <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dragonflybsd.org&#x2F;release54&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dragonflybsd.org&#x2F;release54&#x2F;</a><p><pre><code> DragonFly belongs to the same class of operating systems as other BSD-derived systems and Linux. It is based on the same UNIX ideals and APIs and shares ancestor code with other BSD operating systems. DragonFly provides an opportunity for the BSD base to grow in an entirely different direction from the one taken in the FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD series. DragonFly includes many useful features that differentiate it from other operating systems in the same class.</code></pre>
评论 #18752944 未加载
评论 #18752978 未加载
评论 #18752927 未加载
w323898over 6 years ago
How&#x27;s the EFI support on this in comparison to other BSDs?