How did they determine vaping is 95% less harmful than smoking? I don't see references to the methods they used to make this assessment. Where did that number come from? As far as I can tell, the number was just made up!
I don’t see how many different types of “juice” they tested, maybe I missed it? I always hear (on HN) that it is certain types of flavored juice that is the most harmful, so I’m interested in <i>which one(s)</i> they tested
I call bullshit, they can’t just put out numbers like this.
I remember that one of the last times that I stopped smoking happened because I was literally overdosing on nicotine from vaping almost continuously while drinking.
I stopped for almost one year at the time because I was completely nauseated by vaping.
I think that night was much worse than anything I smoked before, probably comparable to a red Marlboro smoked cutting the filter out (thanks Stephen king and the black tower.. -.- )
I don't get why it is so difficult to check this. At this point there is probably a good amount of people that has been exclusively vaping for the past 10 or 20 years, after decades of smoking. The statistics for lung cancer and other smoke-related illnesses 10 or 20 years after quitting smoking completely should be already well known. It should be enough to compare the two to understand the difference in harm between smoking and vaping?
So it could be 99.99% but they are holding back...better to be pleasantly surprised. :)<p>Isn't it ironic that Philip Morris owns a nice chuck of Juul that aims to get rid of smoking. My guess is that they'll milk this for decades and then pay a small % of their profit to settle claims. Then they'll jump on another bandwagon, maybe buy El Chapo's Select. Rinse, repeat.