TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Save Data Directly to B2 with Backblaze Cloud Backup 6.0

71 pointsby jhackover 6 years ago

9 comments

throwitaway132over 6 years ago
&gt; No More Connecting Your External Drives Every 30 Days<p>Or maybe just don&#x27;t be so eager to purge your paying customers&#x27; backups in the first place? It&#x27;s not like we stop paying your subscription fees as soon as we disconnect a drive.<p>I was a happy Backblaze customer until one day when I went on a month-ish long vacation, took my external hard drive with me, and came back to find the entire backup gone. If the drive went bad or if I were to lose it during the trip, I&#x27;d have been shit out of luck.<p>Switched to Crashplan and never looked back. Even now that they&#x27;re double the price of Backblaze (since they discontinued the consumer plan, I&#x27;ve moved to their business plan) I still find it a much better value proposition because of their _much_ more flexible versioning and retention policies:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.code42.com&#x2F;CrashPlan&#x2F;6&#x2F;Configuring&#x2F;Specify_version_settings" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.code42.com&#x2F;CrashPlan&#x2F;6&#x2F;Configuring&#x2F;Specify_v...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.code42.com&#x2F;CrashPlan&#x2F;6&#x2F;Restoring&#x2F;Retain_and_download_deleted_files" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.code42.com&#x2F;CrashPlan&#x2F;6&#x2F;Restoring&#x2F;Retain_and_...</a><p>None of this &quot;we delete your backups if we don&#x27;t see them for 30 days&quot; bullshit.<p>Versioning and retention is _the_ core value proposition of a backup product imho, and Backblaze is laughably inadequate in this area. Stay away.
评论 #18997695 未加载
评论 #18997811 未加载
评论 #18997550 未加载
评论 #19003539 未加载
ksecover 6 years ago
And it is still very much Desktop based, I wonder if Blackblaze will one day have a Consumer No Fuss NAS along with B2 Subscription model. ( Something I wish Apple had done with Time Capsule and iCloud )<p>So I just set, forget and pay monthly knowingly the Data should be safe.
评论 #18997643 未加载
评论 #19001680 未加载
izacusover 6 years ago
I&#x27;m having trouble finding supported operating systems for the tool - does Backblaze support Linux yet?
评论 #18996748 未加载
评论 #18997381 未加载
cdumlerover 6 years ago
The reason why Backblaze and Crashplan have various restrictions is due to being all-you-can-eat. At some point, they have to create an arbitrary cap. So, the snapshot is a curious feature, but seems to be implemented poorly.<p>It doesn&#x27;t seem to be snapshot system, but an archive system. A snapshot is usually a point in time represented by a series of changes. By being a series of change, it would deduplicate redundant files between snapshots. It appears that this is a full archive backup, which is fine but have some limitations:<p>* Need to upload the whole archive every time. * No deduplication. * Need to have double the space to restore (download then unzip). * No partial restores. * No encryption of personal files.<p>If you have any technical willingness, consider restic. It is a command line utility that has the ability to backup to many backends, including B2. Being a CLI, it can be scripted. Files can be arbitrarily backed up and restored. It has encryption that the servers can never see. I also hear Duplicati is similar, but have never used it.<p>If you want an easy way to just make archives locally and store it on B2 for cheap, consider a cloud mounter, like Mountain Duck. You can treat B2 as a drive and upload&#x2F;download files as needed. Note: B2 is a _very_ simple store, so simple that it doesn&#x27;t support renaming files (must download, rename, and upload). But, it is fast and inexpensive.
mike503over 6 years ago
I see BB pushing B2 more and more and it makes me sad. Instead of a Linux client (which I can’t imagine would be that difficult, ultimately, after this many years) they’re putting all resources on the pay-for-utilization model. Good for them, bad for us waiting for a Linux client.<p>CrashPlan is garbage. Bloated client, keeps breaking down and I get reports my devices aren’t backed up but then they say they are, after backing up 30+ TB (it took years) it says my original backup had to be reset so I had to restart the entire thing, just not a lot of confidence with them. But it is the only unlimited Linux option out there.<p>Also, they just removed their personal plan and do business only and per device now. If they could make their client not suck, and give better confidence in their platform, I wouldn’t complain.
atoavover 6 years ago
I use duplicati with AES-256 for exactly this on backplaze (and another different SFTP target)
评论 #18997015 未加载
bsuttover 6 years ago
This is a pretty useful feature. It goes some way towards solving the problem of keeping a backup of my photos. Rather than having to keep buying more physical storage I can archive off photos in batches to B2 from my regular Backblaze backup.
评论 #18997076 未加载
toomuchtodoover 6 years ago
Very cool feature release. Is it possible to generate a public link to a snapshot?
评论 #18996041 未加载
mshover 6 years ago
I wonder how this works with encrypted Backblaze backups.