TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Notes from Malcolm Gladwell's Writing Masterclass

197 pointsby refrigeratorover 6 years ago

12 comments

wencover 6 years ago
There’s a review[1] on Amazon that speaks to the kind of books Gladwell writes, and it&#x27;s both funny and perhaps contains a shred of truth. It goes:<p><i>”There&#x27;s a school of thought that runs something like this: the average US citizen isn&#x27;t very bright, has a limited attention span, and has an appetite only for the superficial. So if you want to write a book about something you feel to be important, you have to sugar the pill - with lots and lots of sugar and make sure it&#x27;s a very small pill indeed.<p>Hence the style &quot;American-Folksy.&quot; In this genre the author leads the reader gently along by means of first-person narrative, tons of anecdote, and just the gentlest hint of new information here and there. The lexicon is undemanding and the pace is calculated to be just brisk enough to prevent the onset of catatonia while being leisurely enough not to require any strenuous intellectual activity on the part of the reader. It&#x27;s basically DisneyWords.<p>This is a well-tried genre used across a wide variety of subjects. In Search of Excellence and The Omnivore&#x27;s Dilemma both use the same style despite their contexts being very different. And Weiner uses American-Folksy here for precisely the same reasons and to precisely the same effect. The purpose of American-Folksy is to take something that could have made a somewhat interesting 6-page monograph and stretch it out into a book-length peregrination.”</i><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;gp&#x2F;customer-reviews&#x2F;R3KMN29SZX9ZKS&#x2F;ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&amp;ASIN=145169167X" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;gp&#x2F;customer-reviews&#x2F;R3KMN29SZX9ZKS&#x2F;re...</a>
评论 #19226238 未加载
评论 #19223427 未加载
评论 #19223267 未加载
评论 #19224654 未加载
评论 #19224092 未加载
评论 #19223751 未加载
评论 #19224315 未加载
评论 #19224447 未加载
评论 #19224698 未加载
评论 #19223306 未加载
评论 #19231064 未加载
评论 #19226807 未加载
评论 #19225609 未加载
评论 #19226280 未加载
评论 #19223506 未加载
Fragoel2over 6 years ago
Despite owning some of his books, I can&#x27;t say that I am a fan of Gladwell&#x27;s writing style. But his Revisionist History podcast (revisionisthistory.com) is, by far, one of my favourite things to listen to and I highly recommend to give it a shot.
评论 #19224520 未加载
评论 #19225321 未加载
评论 #19224563 未加载
评论 #19224573 未加载
andyjohnson0over 6 years ago
Slightly off topic, but I was thinking of doing Neil Gaiman&#x27;s storytelling course [1] on masterclass.com. Wondering if anyone here has done it and found it useful (or otherwise)?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.masterclass.com&#x2F;classes&#x2F;neil-gaiman-teaches-the-art-of-storytelling" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.masterclass.com&#x2F;classes&#x2F;neil-gaiman-teaches-the-...</a>
评论 #19224809 未加载
评论 #19224794 未加载
cm2012over 6 years ago
Whatever you think about the content, you have to admit Gladwell is a remarkably engaging writer.
duadoover 6 years ago
I can’t believe marketing culture has gotten to the point where someone is pre-announcing Part 2 of his notes and offers to notify you if you subscribe.
评论 #19224202 未加载
评论 #19226410 未加载
评论 #19223669 未加载
duadoover 6 years ago
The best way to read Gladwell is his articles in the New Yorker. His books are just a magazine article’s worth of ideas in book length.
评论 #19228917 未加载
Grustafover 6 years ago
What’s the ketchup conundrum? Is he saying that there is only one tomato based condiment? Or one maker of ketchup? Neither is true.
评论 #19223919 未加载
评论 #19227474 未加载
评论 #19224405 未加载
lvsover 6 years ago
Step 1: take a bunch of research out of context and spin a nice bedtime tale that the data doesn&#x27;t really support.
评论 #19224648 未加载
评论 #19223229 未加载
评论 #19225514 未加载
petullaover 6 years ago
This might have been interesting, but, as a source of truths, it did not age well. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newyorker.com&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;2010&#x2F;10&#x2F;04&#x2F;small-change-malcolm-gladwell" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.newyorker.com&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;2010&#x2F;10&#x2F;04&#x2F;small-change-m...</a>
dmschulmanover 6 years ago
For those leveling the criticism that Gladwell&#x27;s style is too simplistic and unacademic, is this stylistic form simply a product of the author or a product of a publishing industry that knows their audience will choose digestible prose over dense manuscripts (and sponsors authors and their books accordingly)?
评论 #19227679 未加载
zinxqover 6 years ago
In the few times I&#x27;ve read (or started to read) one of Gladwell&#x27;s books I always think &quot;This book would make a great article&quot;.
paulcoleover 6 years ago
If you haven’t heard this before, listen to Gladwell’s unhinged thoughts on which race&#x2F;nationality&#x2F;region (he seems to use the 3 interchangeably) is best at basketball:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;soundcloud.com&#x2F;the-bill-simmons-podcast&#x2F;draymond-vs-kd-embiid-for-mvp-and-the-rise-of-podcasts-with-malcolm-gladwell-and-chris-ryan-the-bill-simmons-podcast-ep-442" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;soundcloud.com&#x2F;the-bill-simmons-podcast&#x2F;draymond-vs-...</a><p>Absolutely wild and the host is just along for the uncomfortable ride. I still have no clue what he was thinking.<p>There are hits, there are misses, and then there are whatever that was.
评论 #19223218 未加载
评论 #19223613 未加载
评论 #19223212 未加载