TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Who has the fastest website in F1?

230 pointsby anacletoabout 6 years ago

13 comments

Rafuinoabout 6 years ago
Wow, that Netflix documentary is reallllly helping grow interest in F1! Enjoyed the long scroll down to see Haas as the winner. I assume the article controls for the physical location of the request (i.e. is Haas fastest because the author is in the US and Haas is the only US-based team and/or hosted site?), but I didn't see it in my perusal.
评论 #19561042 未加载
评论 #19562302 未加载
评论 #19560965 未加载
评论 #19561736 未加载
评论 #19560371 未加载
评论 #19560074 未加载
评论 #19560011 未加载
amanziabout 6 years ago
I'd love to hear from those of you who do web work for these types of big companies. Do they just not care about performance or are there other issues at play? I've dabbled with some small sites and would get stressed if the page load was more than a couple of seconds. How can these companies with large budgets find it acceptable that page loads can take tens of seconds while jumping content around the page or locking up threads with massive JS?
评论 #19560672 未加载
评论 #19560488 未加载
评论 #19559042 未加载
评论 #19560349 未加载
评论 #19561193 未加载
评论 #19560565 未加载
评论 #19559696 未加载
评论 #19559755 未加载
评论 #19560996 未加载
评论 #19562012 未加载
berbecabout 6 years ago
How is it acceptable for any webpage to take 10s+ to render on first load? How did we get here?
评论 #19559316 未加载
评论 #19560112 未加载
评论 #19560165 未加载
blattimwindabout 6 years ago
It makes me kinda sad how the article talks about a five second loading time as something that&#x27;s &quot;relatively good&quot;. I guess between cheaply made, slow sites and huge sites like reddit not giving two fucks about performance the goalposts have shifted dramatically toward the bad.<p>Personally for simple content-based sites I find anything above ~half a second is already quite bad, assuming a reasonable underlying connection to the server (ping &lt; 30 ms).
评论 #19559517 未加载
cyberferretabout 6 years ago
As a long time F1 fan, I love the premise of this article. Perhaps we should also investigate the correlation between team marketing budgets vs web site speed, as that seems to be a major talking point about their R&amp;D budgets vs track speed these days...
deshiabout 6 years ago
When I started out I used to contact companies and try to sell them a site upgrade, generally focusing on something that was better looking. I wonder if now the better opportunity is to demonstrate how much more efficiently you can code their site to increase performance. Reinforcing that with data on how this affects sales and surely you could snatch quite a few contracts.
JshWrightabout 6 years ago
Hey look, Williams is fast again...
评论 #19560547 未加载
hit8runabout 6 years ago
Bloat. Just bloat. Bring back the motherf... website that is just plain old html.
评论 #19560044 未加载
rdbellabout 6 years ago
Testing F1 race team websites for speed is a neat idea.<p>I&#x27;m a cofounder of PacketStream.io<p>We&#x27;d love to see you re-run these tests from our network of global residential proxies to see results from different locations around the globe. Our product lets you select a geolocation to exit from as part of the request.<p>If you&#x27;re interested in free credits to run some more speed tests send me an email: ronald at packetstream io
AJMaxwellabout 6 years ago
This is one of the metrics I use when voting
davidjnelsonabout 6 years ago
Cool article, read the mercedes example. That stuff is super basic, why would they ship such a terrible product?
评论 #19559181 未加载
评论 #19558722 未加载
aboutrubyabout 6 years ago
Would be cool to see what the performance would be with Cloudflare in front of those sites.
评论 #19562853 未加载
mitchtbaumabout 6 years ago
&gt; I mean, it makes sense right?<p>Yes.