TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

MIT Expert Highlights 'Divergent Condition' Caused by 737 Max Engine Placement

2 pointsby chethiyaabout 6 years ago

2 comments

cjbprimeabout 6 years ago
I agree that there should be three AoA sensors, as Airbus already has, if you&#x27;re going to connect the AoA sensors to a control surface.<p>But Hansman&#x27;s comment seems (very surprisingly) inaccurate, because my understanding is that the MAX is not actually aerodynamically unstable: the lift from the nacelles results in a non-monotonic backpressure on the yoke as AoA increases, and that violates airworthiness regulations on yoke handling. But the plane isn&#x27;t going to fly itself into a stall. The pilot has to do that by pulling back on the yoke at high AoA (and with less backpressure than a 737 pilot would expect).<p>That&#x27;s not an unstable plane, in the sense that the B-2 bomber is unstable. It&#x27;s just a plane that handles differently to pilots who originally trained on different but related planes.
chethiyaabout 6 years ago
So this aircraft is more prone to stall and crash compared to other aircrafts after this update?