TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Tor Browser disabled NoScript, but can't update

123 pointsby lichtenbergerabout 6 years ago

9 comments

Faarkabout 6 years ago
&gt; Turns out an unrelated 3rd party can suddenly remotely disable Tor anonymity protections at their whim<p>Am I the only one annoyed by people pushing this &quot;they flicked a switch&quot; narrative? No. They provided shitty software that didn&#x27;t work under certain conditions (in this case date related) and thus broke your shitty software.<p>A third party having remote control capability is something entirely different.
评论 #19833678 未加载
评论 #19833274 未加载
评论 #19833264 未加载
评论 #19833698 未加载
评论 #19833545 未加载
评论 #19833363 未加载
评论 #19833349 未加载
Waterluvianabout 6 years ago
Somewhat related to this ongoing Mozilla plugin saga, are there any infamous stories I should look up that involve huge mistakes leading to unfixable clients? Ie. Imagine bricking your customer&#x27;s devices with an irreversible buggy update. In Mozilla&#x27;s case they were able to deploy a hotfix for many, and an update for others. But I imagine there&#x27;s got to be some great stories about completely bricking countless devices.
评论 #19833028 未加载
评论 #19833007 未加载
评论 #19832991 未加载
评论 #19833178 未加载
评论 #19833379 未加载
评论 #19833131 未加载
评论 #19833170 未加载
评论 #19833374 未加载
评论 #19833071 未加载
评论 #19833197 未加载
deogeoabout 6 years ago
If Mozilla hadn&#x27;t locked down Firefox so much, the fix could have been as simple as going into about:config and flipping a switch to allow unsigned plugins.
评论 #19832995 未加载
评论 #19833125 未加载
评论 #19832989 未加载
评论 #19832975 未加载
评论 #19833550 未加载
d0bbyabout 6 years ago
&gt; Turns out an unrelated 3rd party can suddenly remotely disable Tor anonymity protections at their whim, and possibly endanger TBB users (or deliberately help in deanonymizing them).<p>&gt; remotely disable Tor anonymity protections [!]<p>Maybe a &#x27;certificate is expiring soon&#x27; warning on the browser side?<p>Users would know and Mozilla would be forced to keep certs valid.
AnaniasAnanasabout 6 years ago
One of the weird things here is that javascript is not disabled by default in the Tor Browser and instead an addon is needed.<p>This whole thing is also yet another reason to use something like Tails or Whonix which are much safer to use with JS enabled.
评论 #19833148 未加载
swileyabout 6 years ago
I remember saying over and over again that using Firefox for the TOR browser was a horrible idea.<p>Use curl -H &quot;&quot; and links --dump. Until we have something sane that&#x27;s really the only safe way to browse TOR if you actually have something to hide.<p>(There&#x27;s dillo and other things like the absolutely horrifying browser I&#x27;ve been writing but that hardly even supports forms right now heh. but I&#x27;m worried about connecting stuff like that to stuff like TOR)
评论 #19833633 未加载
johnnydoe9about 6 years ago
Every single one of my Firefox extensions stopped working with an error message that says &quot;could not be verified for use in Firefox and has been disabled&quot; re-downloading doesn&#x27;t work either. I&#x27;m assuming it&#x27;s happening to everyone?
评论 #19833111 未加载
评论 #19833543 未加载
Causality1about 6 years ago
I can&#x27;t improve upon this comment:<p>&quot;Hey Mozilla - this is why people said that forcing addons to be signed with no way to disable was a bad idea. You didn&#x27;t even make it a year without screwing it up.<p>Who could have seen this coming? Oh wait, pretty much everyone who argued against this policy.&quot;
评论 #19833035 未加载
krickabout 6 years ago
How Firefox came to be <i>like that</i>? Which browser should I use <i>now</i>?